3.5 sec in total
228 ms
2.6 sec
664 ms
Welcome to mseo.com homepage info - get ready to check MSEO best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about mseo.com
MSEO offers multilingual SEO, foreign SEO, and international SEO in 28 languages. Providing mobile SEO, multiscreen responsive websites, and responsive web
Visit mseo.comWe analyzed Mseo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
mseo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.056
98/100
15%
Value8.5 s
37/100
10%
228 ms
29 ms
256 ms
280 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Mseo.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (901 ms) belongs to the original domain Mseo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 496.3 kB (27%)
1.8 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Mseo.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 106.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MSEO images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 314.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 314.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mseo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (55%)
38
17
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MSEO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mseo.com
228 ms
ga.js
29 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
256 ms
custom.css
280 ms
css
37 ms
main.css
369 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
379 ms
magnific_popup.css
466 ms
jquery.js
474 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
450 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
555 ms
functions.js
542 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
552 ms
call.js
623 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
617 ms
custom.js
644 ms
smoothscroll.js
725 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
743 ms
waypoints.min.js
737 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
787 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
808 ms
wp-embed.min.js
835 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
269 ms
style.css
288 ms
custom.css
309 ms
shortcodes.css
238 ms
main.css
393 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
262 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
190 ms
magnific_popup.css
209 ms
jquery.js
318 ms
functions.js
141 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
153 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
257 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
137 ms
call.js
164 ms
custom.js
144 ms
smoothscroll.js
170 ms
waypoints.min.js
156 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
153 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
107 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
201 ms
MSEO_LOGO.combig1-300x66.png
144 ms
globeidea.png
175 ms
multiscreen.1.jpg
436 ms
restaurant-puti21-e1402784745606.png
428 ms
Nike_Sports_Camps_small.png
438 ms
airbridge.2.png
437 ms
masterlock.2.png
441 ms
france-400x284.png
444 ms
DDo2.png
447 ms
brillamont.png
446 ms
zwyercaviarlogo.png
450 ms
bluehawaiianresized-400x284.png
449 ms
black-white-background-3_web.jpg
480 ms
wp-embed.min.js
73 ms
bamboomom1.jpg
523 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
38 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
73 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
81 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
78 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
82 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
372 ms
MSEO_LOGO.combig1-300x66.png
301 ms
globeidea.png
303 ms
restaurant-puti21-e1402784745606.png
409 ms
multiscreen.1.jpg
272 ms
airbridge.2.png
125 ms
Nike_Sports_Camps_small.png
215 ms
masterlock.2.png
132 ms
france-400x284.png
132 ms
brillamont.png
276 ms
DDo2.png
221 ms
bluehawaiianresized-400x284.png
278 ms
zwyercaviarlogo.png
347 ms
black-white-background-3_web.jpg
719 ms
bamboomom1.jpg
901 ms
mseo.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mseo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
mseo.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mseo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mseo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mseo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MSEO. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: