5.4 sec in total
1.9 sec
3.4 sec
153 ms
Visit mspcomparison.com now to see the best up-to-date MSPComparison content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mspcomparison.com
MSP Comparison provides independent reviews of the tools and services that you need in your MSP business to create growth and profitability.
Visit mspcomparison.comWe analyzed Mspcomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
mspcomparison.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value1,180 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
1864 ms
160 ms
160 ms
160 ms
450 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Mspcomparison.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Mspcomparison.com.
Page size can be reduced by 409.5 kB (60%)
686.7 kB
277.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Mspcomparison.com main page is 686.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 333.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.3 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, MSPComparison needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 215.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 215.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mspcomparison.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (60%)
90
36
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MSPComparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mspcomparison.com
1864 ms
template.css
160 ms
mod_ijoomlazone.css
160 ms
default.css
160 ms
mootools.js
450 ms
caption.js
181 ms
domready.js
235 ms
theme.css
315 ms
modules.css
238 ms
paginator.css
272 ms
custom_styles_modules.css
312 ms
custom_styles.css
317 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
476 ms
jreviews.js
541 ms
jquery.scrollable.min.js
390 ms
system.css
390 ms
general.css
393 ms
addons.css
483 ms
layout.css
483 ms
template.css
550 ms
typo.css
531 ms
ja.script.js
537 ms
mega.css
544 ms
mega.js
546 ms
ja.rightcol.js
619 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
ga.js
49 ms
108 ms
header-mask.png
96 ms
logo.png
94 ms
auto.png
92 ms
wide.png
93 ms
narrow.png
92 ms
user-increase.png
161 ms
user-reset.png
162 ms
user-decrease.png
163 ms
tn_284_module85__intermapper-network-monitoring-1453139273.png
220 ms
tn_282_module85__optimize-it-operations-1448546175.png
219 ms
tn_281_module85__abtrac-logo-for-myob2-1447888958.jpg
220 ms
tn_278_module85__quoting-1446024622.jpg
243 ms
tn_274_module85__approve-logo-1443932763.png
243 ms
tn_269_module85__network-management-software-badge-1435685066.png
243 ms
tn_266_module85_ryc-logo-small-1433333486.png
311 ms
tn_263_module85__cloudviewnms-1431917163.jpg
313 ms
tn_260_module85__gestevents-1430974480.png
307 ms
tn_256_module85__logo-footer-1428369140.gif
320 ms
tn_254_module85__atera-logo-ho3-1426777895.jpg
321 ms
tn_157_module85_promys-enterprise-logo-410-x-89-1437497840.jpg
319 ms
tn_251_module85__figure-main-1423435853.png
397 ms
tn_23_module85_LabTechmaster_1349700861.jpg
400 ms
tn_180_module85__icon5-1357956070.png
401 ms
tn_34_module85_2010logoMasterowlandtag_1274801156.jpg
398 ms
add-1-icon.png
398 ms
register.png
400 ms
con_info.png
484 ms
ajax-loader.gif
477 ms
grad1-mask.png
470 ms
arrow3.png
483 ms
add-1-icon.png
470 ms
arrow.png
484 ms
container-bg.gif
521 ms
arrows.png
522 ms
icons.png
524 ms
__utm.gif
29 ms
rating_stars.png
489 ms
navigator.png
499 ms
comment_grey.png
485 ms
ca-pub-3658710137379304.js
35 ms
zrt_lookup.html
39 ms
show_ads_impl.js
57 ms
b-br.gif
530 ms
b-bl.gif
526 ms
b-tr.gif
527 ms
collect
115 ms
b-tl.gif
519 ms
bl-br.gif
521 ms
bl-bl.gif
519 ms
ads
456 ms
osd.js
6 ms
bl-tr.gif
522 ms
bl-tl.gif
522 ms
grad1.gif
520 ms
ga-audiences
34 ms
arrow2.png
533 ms
grad3.gif
533 ms
dot1.gif
533 ms
7551346079755906386
31 ms
abg.js
36 ms
m_js_controller.js
52 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
83 ms
s
28 ms
x_button_blue2.png
28 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
3 ms
mspcomparison.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
mspcomparison.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
mspcomparison.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mspcomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mspcomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mspcomparison.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MSPComparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: