Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

mudfactor.com

Mud Factor "Seriously Fun, 5K Obstacle Run!"

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

778 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

769 ms

mudfactor.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mudfactor.com homepage info - get ready to check Mud Factor best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about mudfactor.com

A nationwide, family oriented 5K Obstacle Run celebrating 13 seasons of Mud Run Fun in 2024.

Visit mudfactor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mudfactor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 778 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mudfactor.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mudfactor.com

778 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

11 ms

ut-responsive-grid.css

15 ms

font-awesome.css

19 ms

ut.animate.css

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 119 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Mudfactor.com, 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S9.mylivechat.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (778 ms) belongs to the original domain Mudfactor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (15%)

Content Size

8.2 MB

After Optimization

7.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Mudfactor.com main page is 8.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 65.3 kB

  • Original 78.6 kB
  • After minification 72.7 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 86.0 kB

  • Original 6.7 MB
  • After minification 6.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mud Factor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 529.1 kB

  • Original 796.6 kB
  • After minification 751.2 kB
  • After compression 267.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 529.1 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 528.3 kB

  • Original 612.6 kB
  • After minification 528.0 kB
  • After compression 84.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mudfactor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 528.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (58%)

Requests Now

105

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mud Factor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mudfactor.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

mudfactor.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mudfactor.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mudfactor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mudfactor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mud Factor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: