4 sec in total
714 ms
2.7 sec
595 ms
Click here to check amazing Mudpiefashion content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mudpiefashion.com
Default Description
Visit mudpiefashion.comWe analyzed Mudpiefashion.com page load time and found that the first response time was 714 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
mudpiefashion.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.095
91/100
15%
Value7.0 s
52/100
10%
714 ms
328 ms
266 ms
214 ms
218 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mudpiefashion.com, 48% (23 requests) were made to Smhttp.30639.nexcesscdn.net and 25% (12 requests) were made to Lghttp.30639.nexcesscdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (891 ms) relates to the external source Specialtystoresinc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 968.3 kB (45%)
2.2 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Mudpiefashion.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 944.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mudpiefashion images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 631.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 631.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 241.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mudpiefashion.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 241.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (47%)
47
25
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mudpiefashion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mudpiefashion.com
714 ms
d2660b7f6c9cd4bbc2302ab60cfaae17.css
328 ms
prototype.js
266 ms
ccard.js
214 ms
validation.js
218 ms
builder.js
217 ms
effects.js
216 ms
dragdrop.js
212 ms
controls.js
448 ms
slider.js
449 ms
js.js
452 ms
form.js
449 ms
translate.js
451 ms
cookies.js
453 ms
ajax-reviews.js
537 ms
1378640010.js
70 ms
require.js
636 ms
site.js
572 ms
f968ade315ccf5bc9860d51d591f242a.css
214 ms
ga.js
213 ms
texgyreadventor-regular-webfont.woff
270 ms
_dmpt.js
342 ms
totes-and-bags.png
598 ms
chelsea-initial-collection.png
598 ms
game-day-dresses.png
891 ms
fashion-logo.jpg
93 ms
pajama-time.jpg
661 ms
660033_2_2.jpg
241 ms
660026_2_2.jpg
239 ms
660032_2_2.jpg
238 ms
660034_3.jpg
242 ms
812010bk_2.jpg
242 ms
turtledoves_4.jpg
274 ms
128208_2_2.jpg
272 ms
660013_2_3.jpg
274 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
641 ms
Novecentowide-Book-webfont.woff
82 ms
shopsharkfont-webfont.woff
80 ms
Novecentowide-Normal-webfont.woff
215 ms
Novecentowide-Medium-webfont.woff
172 ms
__utm.gif
82 ms
payment-options-sprite.png
79 ms
bkg_pipe1.gif
80 ms
i_rss.gif
77 ms
jquery.slider.js
79 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
143 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
161 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
240 ms
mudpiefashion.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
mudpiefashion.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mudpiefashion.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mudpiefashion.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Mudpiefashion.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mudpiefashion.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mudpiefashion. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: