Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

museke.com

Museke – Museke

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

229 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

museke.com screenshot

About Website

Visit museke.com now to see the best up-to-date Museke content for Ghana and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about museke.com

Visit museke.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Museke.com page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

museke.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

museke.com

229 ms

thefieldsolutions.com

762 ms

newjump1.do

152 ms

set.do

152 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Museke.com, 25% (1 request) were made to Thefieldsolutions.com and 25% (1 request) were made to Ml8730.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (762 ms) relates to the external source Thefieldsolutions.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.0 kB (20%)

Content Size

95.6 kB

After Optimization

76.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Museke.com main page is 95.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 63.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 362 B

  • Original 813 B
  • After minification 767 B
  • After compression 451 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 362 B or 45% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Museke needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Museke. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

museke.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

museke.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

museke.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Museke.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Museke.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Museke. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: