7.1 sec in total
1.4 sec
5.4 sec
374 ms
Click here to check amazing N Astrup content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nastrup.dk
Design portfolio for Niels Astrup
Visit nastrup.dkWe analyzed Nastrup.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
nastrup.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value19.7 s
0/100
10%
Value2,010 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
1367 ms
95 ms
476 ms
838 ms
278 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Nastrup.dk, 11% (7 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 840.9 kB (57%)
1.5 MB
628.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Nastrup.dk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 842.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 165.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 165.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. N Astrup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 567.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 567.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nastrup.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (66%)
62
21
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of N Astrup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.nastrup.dk
1367 ms
style.css
95 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
476 ms
www.nastrup.dk
838 ms
custom.css
278 ms
style.css
279 ms
fancybox.css
279 ms
gallery.css
280 ms
columns.css
369 ms
jetpack.css
370 ms
jquery.js
554 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
660 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
461 ms
swfobject.js
19 ms
pt-sans.css
463 ms
plugins.js
836 ms
script.js
840 ms
share.js
29 ms
addthis_widget.js
28 ms
output.css
556 ms
photon.js
925 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
10 ms
gprofiles.js
83 ms
wpgroho.js
647 ms
wp-embed.min.js
740 ms
e-201611.js
27 ms
reset.css
954 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
118 ms
webfont.js
50 ms
en_isell_3.png
50 ms
download.png
418 ms
STS-box-and-charger.png
45 ms
folded_standing3.jpg
1179 ms
noise-2.png
407 ms
header-gradient.png
391 ms
twitter-ic-16.png
971 ms
facebook-ic-16.png
392 ms
vimeo.png
414 ms
email-ic-16.png
401 ms
rss.png
406 ms
linkedin.png
406 ms
filter-ic.png
408 ms
tumblr-ic-16.png
408 ms
folder-ic.png
409 ms
link-ic.png
568 ms
footer-gradient.png
409 ms
Thorning-og-Astrup_2014-1-web.png
400 ms
aa14.png
697 ms
KegBox-1-web.jpg
402 ms
thumb.png
405 ms
7silhouettes.jpg
905 ms
P1080652.jpg
399 ms
WP_20130913_008.jpg
30 ms
test8.png
62 ms
IMG_0211.jpg
1919 ms
share-triangle.png
346 ms
hovercard.css
312 ms
services.css
315 ms
css
307 ms
g.gif
42 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
12 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
13 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
5 ms
300lo.json
58 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
37 ms
nastrup.dk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
nastrup.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
nastrup.dk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nastrup.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Nastrup.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nastrup.dk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of N Astrup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: