6.5 sec in total
304 ms
5.9 sec
283 ms
Welcome to oooojournal.net homepage info - get ready to check Oooojournal best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about oooojournal.net
Visit oooojournal.netWe analyzed Oooojournal.net page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
oooojournal.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.8 s
3/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
304 ms
507 ms
208 ms
134 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Oooojournal.net, 6% (5 requests) were made to V4.moatads.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Oooojournal.net.
Page size can be reduced by 927.8 kB (65%)
1.4 MB
494.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Oooojournal.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 150.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 150.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oooojournal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 775.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 775.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (61%)
69
27
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oooojournal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oooojournal.net
304 ms
getSharedSiteSession
507 ms
getSharedSiteSession
208 ms
consumeSharedSessionAction
134 ms
consumeSharedSessionAction
333 ms
consumeSharedSessionAction
152 ms
www.oooojournal.net
501 ms
537390469.js
119 ms
embed.js
9 ms
product.css
211 ms
head_1_53_158_167_13780.css
366 ms
ha.css
165 ms
product.js
653 ms
altmetric_badges-98e4a0c5363439e08b1f025f231428bc.js
29 ms
0.png
45 ms
getMessage
475 ms
satelliteLib-8e350dc4ceceb17a5d77c03f66d95608807a5585.js
10 ms
bg_main.png
285 ms
bg_adHoriz.gif
284 ms
logo.gif
295 ms
facebook.gif
285 ms
feed-icon-14x14.png
285 ms
cov200h.gif
2920 ms
oooo-impact.gif
373 ms
elsevier.jpg
509 ms
eextra.gif
374 ms
virtualmicroscope_o.gif
2824 ms
top25_sd.jpg
633 ms
understandingpubprocess.jpg
635 ms
society1.gif
584 ms
aaom.gif
710 ms
aaomp_oooo.png
799 ms
aaomr.jpg
918 ms
logo_novo3.jpg
922 ms
caomp.jpg
1067 ms
Chilean_logo2.jpg
1097 ms
ChineseSocietyOralMedicine2.jpg
1266 ms
ChineseSocietyOralPathology2.jpg
1254 ms
gtm.js
19 ms
gpt.js
15 ms
mobile_9x16.png
1119 ms
icon_arrow_off.gif
1189 ms
bg_fragmentHeader.png
1228 ms
magnifying-glass.png
1260 ms
bell.png
1333 ms
free.gif
1364 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
51 ms
arrow_right.png
1332 ms
elsevierwordmark-regular-OA.woff
1420 ms
platformFile
138 ms
addthis_widget.js
37 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
satellite-5628673864746d59120020a6.js
98 ms
ads
150 ms
container.html
102 ms
collect
97 ms
rd
96 ms
s-code-contents-87ff59abfc9acf73289bd658598e0b01359c7df7.js
92 ms
300lo.json
60 ms
385.a1b89ff397c1dae17be0.js
51 ms
ui-icons_222222_256x240.png
1146 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
1216 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
39 ms
collect
94 ms
id
115 ms
2480729132457463825
51 ms
moatad.js
201 ms
osd.js
26 ms
ga-audiences
51 ms
s79258415934164
7 ms
pixel.gif
22 ms
pixel.gif
3 ms
pixel.gif
3 ms
activeview
13 ms
pixel.gif
3 ms
pixel.gif
2 ms
small-device.css
72 ms
conversion_async.js
17 ms
34 ms
18 ms
oooojournal.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
oooojournal.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
oooojournal.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oooojournal.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oooojournal.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oooojournal.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oooojournal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: