24.2 sec in total
6.6 sec
8.9 sec
8.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Optimechoice content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about optimechoice.com
женский журнал о красоте и здоровье
Visit optimechoice.comWe analyzed Optimechoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.6 sec and then it took 17.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
optimechoice.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value18.0 s
0/100
10%
Value600 ms
50/100
30%
Value1.07
2/100
15%
Value74.0 s
0/100
10%
6569 ms
839 ms
837 ms
858 ms
856 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Optimechoice.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Optimechoice.com.
Page size can be reduced by 151.4 kB (47%)
321.1 kB
169.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Optimechoice.com main page is 321.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 154.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Optimechoice needs image optimization as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 64.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Optimechoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (33%)
40
27
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Optimechoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
optimechoice.com
6569 ms
style.css
839 ms
frontend.css
837 ms
wprmenu.css
858 ms
css
856 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
867 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
860 ms
jquery.sidr.js
861 ms
wprmenu.js
762 ms
jcookie.js
766 ms
jcarousellite.js
768 ms
superfish.js
768 ms
global.js
770 ms
loopedslider.js
770 ms
scrolltopcontrol.js
789 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
196 ms
icon-search.gif
412 ms
logo.jpg
416 ms
dot.gif
412 ms
timthumb.php
418 ms
timthumb.php
418 ms
timthumb.php
506 ms
timthumb.php
526 ms
slidernav.png
781 ms
timthumb.php
534 ms
timthumb.php
527 ms
timthumb.php
543 ms
timthumb.php
714 ms
timthumb.php
723 ms
timthumb.php
1402 ms
timthumb.php
734 ms
timthumb.php
1982 ms
timthumb.php
863 ms
timthumb.php
867 ms
timthumb.php
881 ms
timthumb.php
948 ms
timthumb.php
1014 ms
timthumb.php
1013 ms
timthumb.php
1031 ms
bg-title.jpg
1149 ms
icon-bullet.gif
1402 ms
hit
371 ms
watch.js
32 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
261 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
268 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
351 ms
optimechoice.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
optimechoice.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
optimechoice.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optimechoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Optimechoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
optimechoice.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Optimechoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: