4.5 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.7 sec
327 ms
Click here to check amazing Optipop content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about optipop.com
Visit optipop.comWe analyzed Optipop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
optipop.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value6.8 s
34/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value5.9 s
66/100
10%
1408 ms
403 ms
106 ms
305 ms
10 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Optipop.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Optipop.com.
Page size can be reduced by 305.9 kB (34%)
906.5 kB
600.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Optipop.com main page is 906.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 460.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Optipop images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 259.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 259.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Optipop.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (43%)
40
23
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Optipop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
optipop.com
1408 ms
style.css
403 ms
SpryMenuBar.js
106 ms
SpryMenuBarHorizontal.css
305 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
comment-reply.min.js
270 ms
wp-embed.min.js
277 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
183 ms
ga.js
6 ms
lg-share-en.gif
18 ms
body_toprail.jpg
95 ms
go_green.gif
113 ms
header.jpg
391 ms
clearlogo.gif
113 ms
this_down.jpg
231 ms
that_down.jpg
183 ms
envelope.jpg
205 ms
swam2.jpg
271 ms
right_column_top.jpg
283 ms
recently.gif
288 ms
Destinations-Report-2013-1_19-1-350x550.jpg
632 ms
DSC0038-550x366.jpg
555 ms
Elizabeth_web-366x550.jpg
591 ms
brightspec1-366x550.jpg
612 ms
brightspec2-366x550.jpg
608 ms
chaloner1-550x413.jpg
649 ms
cphg5-550x330.jpg
812 ms
youtube_logo.jpg
680 ms
twitter_icon.jpg
692 ms
rss_icon.jpg
694 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
SpryMenuBarDownHover.gif
701 ms
SpryMenuBarRightHover.gif
712 ms
atom.jpg
742 ms
callout_top_slate.jpg
765 ms
callout_body.jpg
765 ms
callout_bottom.jpg
792 ms
footer_bg.jpg
800 ms
SpryMenuBarDown.gif
812 ms
SpryMenuBarRight.gif
826 ms
this_hover.jpg
86 ms
optipop.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
optipop.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
optipop.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optipop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Optipop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
optipop.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Optipop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: