3.7 sec in total
438 ms
2.1 sec
1.2 sec
Visit oracular.com now to see the best up-to-date Oracular content for Pakistan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oracular.com
Visit oracular.comWe analyzed Oracular.com page load time and found that the first response time was 438 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
oracular.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
28/100
10%
Value15.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.312
37/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
438 ms
269 ms
80 ms
78 ms
117 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Oracular.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (968 ms) belongs to the original domain Oracular.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (72%)
2.3 MB
649.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Oracular.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 900.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Oracular needs image optimization as it can save up to 900.7 kB or 66% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 279.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 279.9 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 440.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oracular.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 440.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (53%)
64
30
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oracular. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oracular.com
438 ms
bootstrap.css
269 ms
system.css
80 ms
legacy-grid.css
78 ms
font-awesome.min.css
117 ms
template.css
299 ms
megamenu.css
111 ms
off-canvas.css
155 ms
font-awesome.min.css
183 ms
css
34 ms
animate.css
148 ms
mod_jaslideshowlite.css
152 ms
mod_jaslideshowlite-custom.css
189 ms
finder.css
191 ms
animate.css
355 ms
jquery.min.js
369 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
220 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
229 ms
caption.js
284 ms
myScript.js
285 ms
bootstrap.js
368 ms
jquery.tap.min.js
351 ms
off-canvas.js
356 ms
script.js
356 ms
menu.js
631 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
631 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
649 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
358 ms
script.js
380 ms
funfact.js
398 ms
mootools-core.js
629 ms
core.js
414 ms
script.js
439 ms
autocompleter.js
450 ms
viewportchecker.js
476 ms
edsanimate.js
724 ms
system.css
452 ms
oracular%20flat%20logo.png
79 ms
sl1-bg_1920_740.jpg
257 ms
sl3-bg_1920_740.jpg
250 ms
sl3-first.png
823 ms
sl5-bg_1920_740.jpg
250 ms
sl5-first.png
250 ms
sl1-bg_10_10.jpg
79 ms
sl3-bg_10_10.jpg
240 ms
sl5-bg_10_10.jpg
245 ms
services_grey.png
250 ms
about_grey.png
251 ms
clients_grey.png
251 ms
hiring_grey.png
251 ms
consulting_blue.png
817 ms
managed_blue.png
317 ms
hosting_blue.png
314 ms
sl1-first1.png
813 ms
a.png
822 ms
b.png
821 ms
c.png
825 ms
d.png
878 ms
e.png
968 ms
linkedin.png
810 ms
twitter.png
811 ms
youtube.png
811 ms
ja-ss-thumb.png
774 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
146 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
146 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
150 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
148 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
149 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
147 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
578 ms
custom-bg.png
466 ms
slideloading.gif
69 ms
oracular.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
oracular.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
oracular.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oracular.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oracular.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oracular.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oracular. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: