Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

orca-live.net

ORCA LIVE

Page Load Speed

41.9 sec in total

First Response

838 ms

Resources Loaded

40.9 sec

Page Rendered

162 ms

orca-live.net screenshot

About Website

Visit orca-live.net now to see the best up-to-date ORCA LIVE content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about orca-live.net

Visit orca-live.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Orca-live.net page load time and found that the first response time was 838 ms and then it took 41.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 6 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

orca-live.net performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

orca-live.net

838 ms

orcalive.js

389 ms

badge.js

20252 ms

urchin.js

13 ms

smenu1.gif

216 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Orca-live.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Go2web20.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Go2web20.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.1 kB (59%)

Content Size

24.1 kB

After Optimization

10.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Orca-live.net main page is 24.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 14.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 14.0 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 10.1 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (16%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ORCA LIVE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

orca-live.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

orca-live.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

orca-live.net SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Orca-live.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Orca-live.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ORCA LIVE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: