Tools & Wizards About Us
ostercruising.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

ostercruising.com

Ostercruising 2023 - 9.April 2023 Flugplatz Stendal

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

892 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

840 ms

ostercruising.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ostercruising content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ostercruising.com

Template by CocoBasic

Visit ostercruising.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ostercruising.com page load time and found that the first response time was 892 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ostercruising.com performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ostercruising.com

892 ms

prototype.js

808 ms

scriptaculous.js

1024 ms

lightbox.js

1135 ms

lightbox.css

1028 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Ostercruising.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Dsum.casalemedia.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Ad.afy11.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ostercruising.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 216.9 kB (57%)

Content Size

381.4 kB

After Optimization

164.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ostercruising.com main page is 381.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 208.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 44.8 kB
  • After minification 42.9 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 120.0 kB
  • After minification 112.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ostercruising images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 166.5 kB

  • Original 208.0 kB
  • After minification 153.8 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 166.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 8.6 kB
  • After minification 6.1 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ostercruising.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (72%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ostercruising. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ostercruising.com

ostercruising.com

892 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

808 ms

scriptaculous.js

scriptaculous.js

1024 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

1135 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

1028 ms

template_css.css

template_css.css

1028 ms

515.js

515.js

265 ms

d3b2e49c6cd04b7004040259e3323152.js

d3b2e49c6cd04b7004040259e3323152.js

266 ms

srad.js

srad.js

58 ms

effects.js

effects.js

329 ms

builder.js

builder.js

219 ms

topsite_count.php

topsite_count.php

336 ms

body_bg1.gif

body_bg1.gif

113 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

110 ms

cornerleft.png

cornerleft.png

119 ms

cornerright.png

cornerright.png

219 ms

kopf.gif

kopf.gif

222 ms

Ostern16.jpg

Ostern16.jpg

579 ms

%C3%9Cbersichtsplan.jpg

%C3%9Cbersichtsplan.jpg

323 ms

img_6425_82_20110424_1070056413.jpg

img_6425_82_20110424_1070056413.jpg

327 ms

bersichtsplan.jpg

bersichtsplan.jpg

571 ms

studleft.gif

studleft.gif

442 ms

studright.gif

studright.gif

449 ms

unten.gif

unten.gif

570 ms

bottleft.png

bottleft.png

571 ms

bottright.png

bottright.png

661 ms

top.png

top.png

660 ms

header.gif

header.gif

976 ms

barleft.png

barleft.png

768 ms

barleftmod.png

barleftmod.png

769 ms

barmid.png

barmid.png

788 ms

edgeleft.png

edgeleft.png

879 ms

moduleheader.png

moduleheader.png

881 ms

arrow.gif

arrow.gif

987 ms

centerbg.gif

centerbg.gif

988 ms

1243543830@Position2,TopRight,Right2,Right1,Top1,Frame1!TopRight

1243543830@Position2,TopRight,Right2,Right1,Top1,Frame1!TopRight

259 ms

empty.gif

empty.gif

37 ms

bullet.gif

bullet.gif

734 ms

ad

ad

36 ms

usermatch

usermatch

28 ms

5447

5447

33 ms

topsite_count.php

topsite_count.php

106 ms

edgeright.png

edgeright.png

740 ms

footer.gif

footer.gif

850 ms

bottom.png

bottom.png

834 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

844 ms

closelabel.gif

closelabel.gif

847 ms

ad

ad

54 ms

usermatch

usermatch

20 ms

400966.gif

400966.gif

6 ms

rand=9505

rand=9505

8 ms

gr

gr

14 ms

casale

casale

8 ms

Vu7rPcAoJZYAAcXF.uUAAABx%26971

Vu7rPcAoJZYAAcXF.uUAAABx%26971

59 ms

pixel

pixel

35 ms

ad

ad

55 ms

casale

casale

10 ms

pixel

pixel

73 ms

rum

rum

81 ms

crum

crum

54 ms

rum

rum

40 ms

crum

crum

34 ms

crum

crum

22 ms

pixel

pixel

39 ms

m

m

55 ms

rum

rum

45 ms

crum

crum

29 ms

Accessibility Review

ostercruising.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ostercruising.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ostercruising.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ostercruising.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ostercruising.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ostercruising.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ostercruising. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: