2.4 sec in total
94 ms
2.1 sec
160 ms
Click here to check amazing Outlook Web App content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about outlook-web-app.com
Exchange 2007 Outlook Web Access knowledge base, including OWA 2007 articles, white papers, tips, frequently asked questions and software links
Visit outlook-web-app.comWe analyzed Outlook-web-app.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
outlook-web-app.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
49/100
10%
94 ms
1547 ms
38 ms
39 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Outlook-web-app.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Intensedebate.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Outlook-web-app.com.
Page size can be reduced by 386.9 kB (31%)
1.2 MB
862.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Outlook-web-app.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 845.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Outlook Web App images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Outlook-web-app.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (50%)
76
38
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Outlook Web App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
outlook-web-app.com
94 ms
www.outlook-web-app.com
1547 ms
rokcomments.css
38 ms
grid-12.css
39 ms
gantry.css
40 ms
joomla.css
42 ms
joomla.css
44 ms
bodystyle-light.css
58 ms
typography.css
74 ms
extensions.css
81 ms
extensions-light.css
65 ms
demo-styles.css
66 ms
template.css
93 ms
template-win.css
134 ms
overlays.css
103 ms
fusionmenu.css
94 ms
rokajaxsearch.css
141 ms
rokajaxsearch-theme.css
140 ms
mootools-1.2.5.js
215 ms
caption.js
123 ms
gantry-buildspans-mt1.2.js
151 ms
gantry-inputs-mt1.2.js
153 ms
gantry-smartload-mt1.2.js
158 ms
rt-fixedheader.js
159 ms
load-transition-mt1.2.js
170 ms
fusion-mt1.2.js
191 ms
rokajaxsearch-mt1.2.js
249 ms
menuopen.js
324 ms
genericCommentWrapperV2.js
171 ms
overlay-top.png
173 ms
overlay-top2.png
58 ms
logo.png
60 ms
top-div.png
59 ms
dark-20.png
61 ms
topdaddy.png
60 ms
top-shadow.png
61 ms
messageware_468x60-slower.gif
171 ms
link.png
61 ms
hyperlink.png
62 ms
signature2.png
62 ms
paste2.png
167 ms
crash2.jpg
166 ms
filter.gif
168 ms
business%20view.png
165 ms
business.gif
170 ms
people%20view.png
174 ms
people3.gif
170 ms
offline.png
170 ms
2013%20oab_architecture.png
314 ms
delegate%20permissions%201.5.png
173 ms
delegate%20permissions%202.5.jpg
169 ms
delegate%20permissions%203.5.jpg
170 ms
delegate%20permissions%204.5.jpg
169 ms
delegate%20permissions%205.5.jpg
172 ms
delegate%20permissions%206.5.jpg
172 ms
delegate%20permissions%207.5.jpg
179 ms
folder%20permissions%201.jpg
196 ms
folder%20permissions%202.jpg
180 ms
folder%20permissions%203.jpg
187 ms
folder%20permissions%204.jpg
187 ms
folder%20permissions%205.jpg
223 ms
folder%20permissions%206.jpg
220 ms
folder%20permissions%207.jpg
231 ms
folder%20permissions%208.jpg
171 ms
folder%20permissions%209.jpg
185 ms
outlook%20mobile2.png
254 ms
username.jpg
196 ms
link_arrow.jpg
218 ms
Ubuntu-Regular-webfont.woff
201 ms
genericCommentWrapper2.php
311 ms
tip_bg.jpg
148 ms
submit_bg.jpg
154 ms
title-overlay-top.png
155 ms
title-overlay-bottom.png
154 ms
readon-bg.png
153 ms
search-icon.png
195 ms
body-inputs.png
228 ms
blank.gif
162 ms
spinner.gif
228 ms
outlook-web-app.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
outlook-web-app.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
outlook-web-app.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Outlook-web-app.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Outlook-web-app.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
outlook-web-app.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Outlook Web App. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: