3.4 sec in total
443 ms
2.8 sec
198 ms
Welcome to packaging.com.au homepage info - get ready to check Packaging best content right away, or after learning these important things about packaging.com.au
Looking for quality packaging equipment for your business? Visit us online for more information and place your online order with next day delivery to Brisbane, Sydney & Melbourne!
Visit packaging.com.auWe analyzed Packaging.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 443 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
packaging.com.au performance score
443 ms
201 ms
397 ms
398 ms
399 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Packaging.com.au, 11% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Packaging.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 540.2 kB (51%)
1.1 MB
514.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Packaging.com.au main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 632.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Packaging needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 424.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 424.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packaging.com.au needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (39%)
70
43
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
packaging.com.au
443 ms
style.css
201 ms
ddlevelsmenu-base.css
397 ms
ddlevelsmenu-topbar.css
398 ms
ddlevelsmenu.js
399 ms
jquery.min.js
607 ms
jquery.zoom.js
400 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
407 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
592 ms
jquery.mobile-1.0.1.min.js
593 ms
script.js
594 ms
addthis_widget.js
9 ms
mlt.js
9 ms
blank.js
13 ms
blank.js
30 ms
pg-bg.jpg
210 ms
logo.jpg
209 ms
tagline-top.jpg
396 ms
nav-rtbar.jpg
396 ms
blank.gif
210 ms
prod-1.jpg
397 ms
prod-2.jpg
400 ms
prod-3.jpg
598 ms
heading.png
402 ms
icon-feature.png
598 ms
blog-icon.png
596 ms
signetonlinestore.png
989 ms
visit-our-online-store.jpg
598 ms
callback2.png
600 ms
gtm.js
77 ms
nav-bg-strip.jpg
795 ms
menu-divider.jpg
794 ms
bg-menu-home.jpg
794 ms
banner-bg.jpg
985 ms
breadcrumb-bg.jpg
787 ms
bread-lr.jpg
981 ms
cont-bg.jpg
985 ms
arr-2.jpg
985 ms
star.png
986 ms
shadow.jpg
1177 ms
blog-arrow.jpg
1180 ms
footer-corner.jpg
1113 ms
follow-sep.jpg
1114 ms
follow.jpg
1114 ms
vms.js
114 ms
300lo.json
46 ms
all.js&version=v2.0
381 ms
widgets.js
10 ms
plusone.js
60 ms
counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js
8 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
43 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
52 ms
shares.json
48 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
27 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
48 ms
fastbutton
94 ms
bc.pv
114 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
25 ms
postmessageRelay
59 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
31 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
30 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
32 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
32 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
33 ms
clear.gif
92 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
jot
82 ms
32 ms
xd_arbiter.php
130 ms
xd_arbiter.php
251 ms
ping
12 ms
like.php
144 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
328 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
365 ms
packaging.com.au SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packaging.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Packaging.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
packaging.com.au
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: