2.8 sec in total
507 ms
2 sec
318 ms
Welcome to pediapress.com homepage info - get ready to check Pedia Press best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about pediapress.com
Visit pediapress.comWe analyzed Pediapress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 507 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
pediapress.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
83/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value1,670 ms
11/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
507 ms
274 ms
600 ms
94 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Pediapress.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (980 ms) belongs to the original domain Pediapress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 74.7 kB (32%)
231.6 kB
156.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Pediapress.com main page is 231.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 153.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pedia Press needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 29.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pediapress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
44
44
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pedia Press. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
pediapress.com
507 ms
css-pp.ed64832fd239afd182443186de8e429e.css
274 ms
js-pp.eeace7a7e4e53ce73ead3291057f5624.js
600 ms
logo.png
94 ms
cart_dark.png
184 ms
home_banner_en.jpg
274 ms
usecase_couple_118.jpg
184 ms
usecase_grandpa_118.jpg
187 ms
usecase_engineer_118.jpg
187 ms
712 ms
575 ms
714 ms
713 ms
706 ms
samplebook.png
409 ms
pedia-hill-2.jpg
503 ms
pedia-mac-2-wikipedia-screenshot.jpg
597 ms
pedia-still-2.jpg
665 ms
pedia-still-5.jpg
690 ms
pedia-still-3.jpg
755 ms
pedia-shelf-1.jpg
783 ms
wikipedia_logo.png
886 ms
twitter.png
800 ms
facebook.png
802 ms
rss.png
804 ms
paypal.gif
846 ms
mastercard.gif
874 ms
visa.gif
890 ms
ga.js
32 ms
feedback.png
886 ms
header_grad.png
888 ms
mainnav_tabs.gif
925 ms
external.png
958 ms
box_white_746px.png
966 ms
footer_grad.png
971 ms
footernav_left.png
977 ms
footernav_right.png
980 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
756 ms
background_browser.gif
720 ms
browser_firefox.gif
721 ms
browser_chrome.gif
729 ms
browser_safari.gif
739 ms
browser_opera.gif
755 ms
browser_gcf.gif
811 ms
pediapress.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pediapress.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pediapress.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pediapress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pediapress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pediapress.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pedia Press. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: