2.8 sec in total
546 ms
2.1 sec
194 ms
Welcome to perhapstomorrow.com homepage info - get ready to check Perhaps Tomorrow best content right away, or after learning these important things about perhapstomorrow.com
Visit perhapstomorrow.comWe analyzed Perhapstomorrow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 546 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
perhapstomorrow.com performance score
546 ms
382 ms
119 ms
118 ms
377 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Perhapstomorrow.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (821 ms) belongs to the original domain Perhapstomorrow.com.
Page size can be reduced by 252.6 kB (50%)
509.5 kB
256.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Perhapstomorrow.com main page is 509.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 242.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Perhaps Tomorrow images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 158.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Perhapstomorrow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (89%)
66
7
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perhaps Tomorrow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
perhapstomorrow.com
546 ms
system.base.css
382 ms
system.menus.css
119 ms
system.messages.css
118 ms
system.theme.css
377 ms
comment.css
150 ms
field.css
174 ms
logintoboggan.css
191 ms
node.css
205 ms
search.css
227 ms
user.css
245 ms
views.css
254 ms
chosen.css
336 ms
ckeditor.css
258 ms
colorbox_default_style.css
271 ms
ctools.css
315 ms
superfish.css
327 ms
superfish-vertical.css
365 ms
superfish-navbar.css
374 ms
alpha-reset.css
385 ms
alpha-mobile.css
386 ms
alpha-alpha.css
387 ms
formalize.css
416 ms
omega-text.css
422 ms
omega-branding.css
429 ms
omega-menu.css
429 ms
omega-forms.css
693 ms
omega-visuals.css
464 ms
navin-base.css
474 ms
navin-font.css
476 ms
navin-form.css
525 ms
navin-branding.css
509 ms
navin-menu.css
519 ms
navin-header.css
523 ms
navin-preface.css
555 ms
navin-content.css
570 ms
pinit.js
7 ms
navin-postfix.css
529 ms
navin-footer.css
505 ms
navin-alpha-default-normal.css
528 ms
alpha-default-normal-24.css
520 ms
jquery.js
704 ms
jquery.once.js
498 ms
drupal.js
546 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
543 ms
chosen.js
744 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
821 ms
colorbox.js
503 ms
colorbox_default_style.js
507 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
490 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
498 ms
superfish.js
521 ms
supersubs.js
536 ms
supposition.js
545 ms
sftouchscreen.js
535 ms
googleanalytics.js
550 ms
global.js
547 ms
jquery.formalize.js
560 ms
omega-mediaqueries.js
582 ms
omega-equalheights.js
561 ms
ga.js
74 ms
perhaps-tomorrow.png
194 ms
perhaps-tomorrow-cover.jpg
287 ms
loading_animation.gif
49 ms
controls.png
50 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
pinit_main.js
425 ms
perhapstomorrow.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perhapstomorrow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Perhapstomorrow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
perhapstomorrow.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Perhaps Tomorrow. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: