4.3 sec in total
560 ms
3.3 sec
464 ms
Visit picturereport.net now to see the best up-to-date Picturereport content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about picturereport.net
| Berlin City Design | Matthias Makarinus Photo Collection | Berlin HD & 4K HQ Footage | Hyperlapse & Timelapse |
Visit picturereport.netWe analyzed Picturereport.net page load time and found that the first response time was 560 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
picturereport.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value19.6 s
0/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.568
12/100
15%
Value21.0 s
1/100
10%
560 ms
123 ms
228 ms
240 ms
410 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Picturereport.net, 14% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Picturereport.net.
Page size can be reduced by 820.3 kB (72%)
1.1 MB
313.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Picturereport.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 734.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Picturereport images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 503.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 503.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 295.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Picturereport.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 295.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (66%)
29
10
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Picturereport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.picturereport.net
560 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
123 ms
styles.css
228 ms
settings.css
240 ms
captions.php
410 ms
style.css
211 ms
theme.css
375 ms
responsive.css
246 ms
custom.css
321 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
557 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
350 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
463 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
536 ms
jquery.form.min.js
454 ms
scripts.js
478 ms
theme.js
507 ms
logo.jpg
115 ms
logo1.jpg
114 ms
oyster_sprite.png
146 ms
bchg6.jpg
1625 ms
piwik.js
223 ms
156406155
88 ms
G0XvmuebhPCfCq4YdUpRgALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
31 ms
fa.woff
477 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
34 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
38 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
55 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIiZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
38 ms
player.js
120 ms
player.css
97 ms
ga.js
53 ms
vuid.min.js
94 ms
__utm.gif
35 ms
proxy.html
35 ms
picturereport.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
picturereport.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
picturereport.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Picturereport.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Picturereport.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
picturereport.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Picturereport. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: