Tools & Wizards About Us
pismail.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

pismail.com

Page Load Speed

18.5 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

18.1 sec

Page Rendered

254 ms

pismail.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pismail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pismail.com

Visit pismail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pismail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 18.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pismail.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.783

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pismail.com

164 ms

cloudflare.min.js

12 ms

css

25 ms

grid12.css

825 ms

james_typography.css

2848 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Pismail.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Pismail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

728.9 kB

After Optimization

645.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Pismail.com main page is 728.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 583.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 583.6 kB
  • After minification 581.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pismail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 71.9 kB

  • Original 131.6 kB
  • After minification 131.6 kB
  • After compression 59.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.9 kB or 55% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (72%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pismail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pismail.com

pismail.com

164 ms

cloudflare.min.js

cloudflare.min.js

12 ms

css

css

25 ms

grid12.css

grid12.css

825 ms

james_typography.css

james_typography.css

2848 ms

main.css

main.css

76 ms

color_scheme_light.css

color_scheme_light.css

1835 ms

color_palette_indigo.css

color_palette_indigo.css

1836 ms

rapid-icons.css

rapid-icons.css

2855 ms

responsivity.css

responsivity.css

2851 ms

animate.css

animate.css

2862 ms

nivo-lightbox.css

nivo-lightbox.css

3850 ms

default.css

default.css

3859 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

3854 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

3860 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

3862 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

3865 ms

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

3969 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

3970 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

4874 ms

materialize.js

materialize.js

3966 ms

classie.js

classie.js

4867 ms

retina.js

retina.js

4871 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

15043 ms

nivo-lightbox.min.js

nivo-lightbox.min.js

15121 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

15882 ms

main.js

main.js

16886 ms

bag2

bag2

4828 ms

ga.js

ga.js

33 ms

img.gif

img.gif

1024 ms

logo.png

logo.png

13057 ms

feature_mockup_1.png

feature_mockup_1.png

14002 ms

feature_mockup_2.png

feature_mockup_2.png

13998 ms

review_01.jpg

review_01.jpg

14006 ms

review_02.jpg

review_02.jpg

14004 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

62 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

63 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

66 ms

Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

66 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

64 ms

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

64 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

17 ms

rapid-icon-font.woff

rapid-icon-font.woff

13114 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

40 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

Accessibility Review

pismail.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pismail.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

pismail.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pismail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pismail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pismail.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pismail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: