5.1 sec in total
1.8 sec
3.1 sec
214 ms
Click here to check amazing Polamer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about polamer.us
Visit polamer.usWe analyzed Polamer.us page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
polamer.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value20.1 s
0/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value600 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.414
24/100
15%
Value7.6 s
47/100
10%
1819 ms
138 ms
165 ms
168 ms
448 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Polamer.us, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Polamer.us.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (57%)
2.9 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Polamer.us main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polamer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 563.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 563.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polamer.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (80%)
50
10
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polamer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
polamer.us
1819 ms
print.css
138 ms
display.css
165 ms
styles.css
168 ms
settings.css
448 ms
checkbox.min.css
166 ms
main.css
193 ms
css
23 ms
bootstrap.min.css
36 ms
font-awesome.min.css
22 ms
style.css
462 ms
form-theme-red.min.css
226 ms
js_composer.css
863 ms
ultimate.min.css
770 ms
Defaults.css
397 ms
jquery.js
664 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
471 ms
display.js
471 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
598 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
801 ms
ultimate.min.js
913 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
588 ms
tipTip.css
612 ms
core.min.js
626 ms
datepicker.min.js
792 ms
jquery.form.min.js
718 ms
scripts.js
727 ms
bootstrap.min.js
5 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-packed.min.js
883 ms
jquery.appear.js
812 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
839 ms
comment-reply.min.js
840 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.min.js
840 ms
SmoothScroll.min.js
840 ms
custom-script.js
884 ms
jquery.tipTip.minified.js
933 ms
js_composer_front.js
935 ms
waypoints.min.js
947 ms
logo-blue2.png
129 ms
large-no-background-e1430847532632.png
143 ms
web1.jpg
274 ms
nb3-e1430494000784.jpg
284 ms
pano-e1430504046851.jpg
415 ms
line_title.png
270 ms
1.png
270 ms
2.png
268 ms
3.png
271 ms
4.png
277 ms
5.png
299 ms
6.png
345 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
42 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
42 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
43 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
44 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
41 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
42 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
47 ms
revicons.woff
78 ms
polamer.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
polamer.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
polamer.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polamer.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polamer.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
polamer.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polamer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: