Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

politemail.com

PoliteMail for Internal Communications Measurement

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

370 ms

Resources Loaded

980 ms

Page Rendered

419 ms

politemail.com screenshot

About Website

Visit politemail.com now to see the best up-to-date Polite Mail content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about politemail.com

The internal communications platform that plugs into Outlook. Create, measure, target, and gain valuable insights into your email campaigns.

Visit politemail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Politemail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 370 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

politemail.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.247

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

politemail.com

370 ms

metro-bootstrap.css

25 ms

metro-bootstrap-responsive.css

7 ms

iconFont.min.css

7 ms

PM-Metro-Customizations.css

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Politemail.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (370 ms) belongs to the original domain Politemail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (56%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Politemail.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 125.2 kB

  • Original 166.5 kB
  • After minification 162.5 kB
  • After compression 41.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 768.9 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 776.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Polite Mail needs image optimization as it can save up to 768.9 kB or 50% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 689.3 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 610.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 689.3 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 309.0 kB

  • Original 350.3 kB
  • After minification 297.3 kB
  • After compression 41.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Politemail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 309.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polite Mail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

politemail.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

politemail.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

politemail.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Politemail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Politemail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polite Mail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: