1.2 sec in total
123 ms
874 ms
201 ms
Welcome to polygraph.com homepage info - get ready to check Polygraph best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about polygraph.com
Learn about Lacework's data platform, Polygraph®, that automatically finds the data that matters most across your cloud environments. See it in action today.
Visit polygraph.comWe analyzed Polygraph.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
polygraph.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.137
79/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
123 ms
33 ms
24 ms
82 ms
108 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Polygraph.com, 78% (54 requests) were made to Assets.neo.registeredsite.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (293 ms) relates to the external source Assets.neo.registeredsite.com.
Page size can be reduced by 456.9 kB (39%)
1.2 MB
710.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Polygraph.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 766.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Polygraph needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 194.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 194.9 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 210.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polygraph.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 210.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (89%)
65
7
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polygraph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
polygraph.com
123 ms
site.css
33 ms
css
24 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
82 ms
bootstrap.min.css
108 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
78 ms
jquery.fancyScroll.css
84 ms
spectrum.css
85 ms
kendo.common.min.css
125 ms
kendo.flat.min.css
119 ms
site.css
122 ms
pagetree.css
123 ms
intro.min.css
139 ms
neo.css
140 ms
jquery.min.js
149 ms
jquery.knob.js
162 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
170 ms
bootstrap.min.js
163 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
164 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.js
166 ms
jquery.slimscroll.min.js
196 ms
jquery.fancyScroll.js
198 ms
angular.min.js
202 ms
spectrum.js
198 ms
tinymce.min.js
234 ms
kendo.neo.min.js
225 ms
angular-kendo.min.js
198 ms
jquery.validate.js
199 ms
resumable.js
223 ms
core.js
223 ms
util.js
224 ms
ajax.js
223 ms
log.js
224 ms
webcomApp.js
288 ms
pagetree.js
290 ms
templating.js
292 ms
cssparser.js
292 ms
jquery.parsecss.js
293 ms
easeljs.min.js
293 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
225 ms
bootstrap-select.js
224 ms
bootstrap-switch.js
222 ms
flatui-checkbox.js
222 ms
flatui-radio.js
188 ms
jquery.tagsinput.js
207 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
208 ms
easyXDM.js
193 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
197 ms
blank-kv.jpg
54 ms
html2canvas.js
187 ms
asset-1434155553214.png
54 ms
galleria.min.js
179 ms
URI.js
183 ms
facebooksdk.js
194 ms
googleplus.js
195 ms
uuid.js
196 ms
intro.min.js
165 ms
neo.js
167 ms
ico-twitter-blue.png
184 ms
7Ackeu8d62Q
140 ms
IGQFaxr6QFntFZmYFeQEew.ttf
9 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
26 ms
www-embed-player.js
43 ms
base.js
61 ms
logger.php
153 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
39 ms
ad_status.js
35 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
62 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
63 ms
polygraph.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
polygraph.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
polygraph.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polygraph.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Polygraph.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
polygraph.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polygraph. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: