10.6 sec in total
1.1 sec
8.4 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Polyne content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about polyne.net
Visit polyne.netWe analyzed Polyne.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
polyne.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value21.9 s
0/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
1055 ms
705 ms
4 ms
363 ms
365 ms
Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Polyne.net, 21% (24 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 12% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Polyne.net.
Page size can be reduced by 565.2 kB (64%)
881.1 kB
315.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Polyne.net main page is 881.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 497.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polyne images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 307.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 184.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polyne.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 184.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (46%)
96
52
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polyne. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
polyne.net
1055 ms
bootstrap.min.css
705 ms
font-awesome.min.css
4 ms
owl.carousel.css
363 ms
prettyPhoto.css
365 ms
style.css
555 ms
css
24 ms
css
37 ms
jquery.min.js
9 ms
styles.css
372 ms
jquery.js
979 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
542 ms
modernizr.js
725 ms
jquery.js
1021 ms
js
56 ms
jquery.ui.map.js
569 ms
jquery.easing.js
568 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
698 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1019 ms
isotope.pkgd.js
1020 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
903 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1094 ms
owl.carousel.js
1354 ms
jquery.nav.js
1089 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
1184 ms
jquery.sticky.js
1196 ms
ticker.js
1195 ms
script.js
1355 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1444 ms
scripts.js
1401 ms
jquery.optimum-lazy-load.min.js
1402 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1401 ms
conversion.js
38 ms
notosansjapanese.css
14 ms
ga.js
13 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1043 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
collect
60 ms
logo.png
746 ms
icon_line.png
1161 ms
3.jpg
1451 ms
5.jpg
1600 ms
7-2.jpg
2235 ms
1.jpg
2138 ms
6.jpg
2305 ms
Story-21.jpg
2599 ms
2.jpg
3117 ms
4.jpg
3362 ms
9.jpg
3357 ms
tyou.jpg
3389 ms
dai.jpg
3640 ms
mon.jpg
3981 ms
1.jpg
5746 ms
top_img04.jpg
4294 ms
top_img01.jpg
4203 ms
top_img02.jpg
4332 ms
top_img03.jpg
4895 ms
maps.jpg
4362 ms
footer_pagetop.png
4189 ms
NotoSansJP-Regular.woff
74 ms
NotoSansJP-Medium.woff
167 ms
NotoSansJP-DemiLight.woff
174 ms
NotoSansJP-Light.woff
176 ms
NotoSansJP-Thin.woff
170 ms
NotoSansJP-Bold.woff
173 ms
NotoSansJP-Black.woff
168 ms
2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1CV6uyC_qD11hrFQ6EGgTJWI.ttf
165 ms
UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgICsv6SrURqJprbhH_C1Mw8w.ttf
169 ms
UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIKqwMe2wjvZrAR44M0BJZ48.ttf
172 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
67 ms
4.jpg
5214 ms
32 ms
polyne.net
4145 ms
ajax-loader.gif
3911 ms
66 ms
common.js
6 ms
util.js
26 ms
stats.js
45 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
206 ms
map.js
3 ms
marker.js
36 ms
onion.js
17 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
179 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
168 ms
controls.js
12 ms
css
185 ms
transparent.png
140 ms
office-building.png
426 ms
google4.png
120 ms
mapcnt6.png
124 ms
sv5.png
122 ms
tmapctrl.png
69 ms
cb_scout5.png
84 ms
tmapctrl4.png
83 ms
imgs8.png
84 ms
vt
109 ms
vt
104 ms
vt
102 ms
vt
108 ms
vt
117 ms
vt
102 ms
vt
212 ms
vt
213 ms
vt
212 ms
vt
212 ms
vt
211 ms
vt
212 ms
vt
254 ms
vt
283 ms
vt
245 ms
vt
351 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
23 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
39 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
73 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
106 ms
polyne.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
polyne.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
polyne.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polyne.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polyne.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
polyne.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Polyne. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: