5 sec in total
290 ms
4.2 sec
487 ms
Visit polytest.org now to see the best up-to-date Polytest content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about polytest.org
Schedule a Polygraph with one of our experienced examiners. Trust our A+ rating and register for an exam today at one of our convenient locations.
Visit polytest.orgWe analyzed Polytest.org page load time and found that the first response time was 290 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
polytest.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value5.3 s
59/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
290 ms
371 ms
30 ms
28 ms
478 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Polytest.org, 2% (1 request) were made to Static.dudamobile.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Polytest.org.
Page size can be reduced by 812.9 kB (36%)
2.2 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Polytest.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 553.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Polytest needs image optimization as it can save up to 553.8 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 192.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 192.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polytest.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (45%)
38
21
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polytest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
polytest.org
290 ms
index.asp
371 ms
DM_redirect.js
30 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
jquery.min.js
478 ms
distrib.min.js
322 ms
easybox.min.js
257 ms
handlers.min.js
181 ms
easybox.min.css
279 ms
css
24 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
542 ms
init.js
519 ms
jquery.dropotron-1.2.js
489 ms
jquery.slidertron-1.2.js
845 ms
init.js
487 ms
developer.css
871 ms
DM_redirect.js
783 ms
core.css
209 ms
style.css
223 ms
core-desktop.css
159 ms
style-desktop.css
270 ms
core-1200px.css
175 ms
black-seal-153-100-global-polygraph-network-152604300.png
79 ms
bg01.jpg
233 ms
bg03.png
380 ms
logo.fw.png
901 ms
bg02.jpg
242 ms
bg04.png
241 ms
officeBldg.jpg
2268 ms
bg05.png
387 ms
icons.png
382 ms
globe.jpg
1411 ms
polytest.fw.png
2033 ms
fraud.jpg
728 ms
couple-with-problems.jpg
1028 ms
television.jpg
1232 ms
microphone.jpg
1423 ms
pic08.jpg
1588 ms
top10.fw.png
2511 ms
polygraph_rental.jpg
1631 ms
bg.png
1665 ms
polytest.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
polytest.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
polytest.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polytest.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Polytest.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
polytest.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polytest. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: