Tools & Wizards About Us
projectfork.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

projectfork.net

Magazine Project Fork -

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

536 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

278 ms

projectfork.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Project Fork content for Nigeria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about projectfork.net

Joomla Project Management Component

Visit projectfork.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Projectfork.net page load time and found that the first response time was 536 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

projectfork.net performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

projectfork.net

536 ms

template.css

807 ms

css

27 ms

jquery.min.js

357 ms

bootstrap.min.js

271 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Projectfork.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (807 ms) belongs to the original domain Projectfork.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 340.5 kB (47%)

Content Size

722.1 kB

After Optimization

381.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Projectfork.net main page is 722.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 274.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 17.6 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 31.2 kB

  • Original 273.4 kB
  • After minification 242.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Project Fork needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 160.4 kB

  • Original 274.4 kB
  • After minification 263.6 kB
  • After compression 114.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 160.4 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 131.4 kB

  • Original 152.7 kB
  • After minification 126.9 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectfork.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (10%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Project Fork. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

projectfork.net

projectfork.net

536 ms

template.css

template.css

807 ms

css

css

27 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

357 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

271 ms

load-image.min.js

load-image.min.js

183 ms

bootstrap-image-gallery.min.js

bootstrap-image-gallery.min.js

183 ms

mixpanel-2.2.min.js

mixpanel-2.2.min.js

87 ms

logo.png

logo.png

99 ms

projectfork-screens.png

projectfork-screens.png

175 ms

projects-one.jpg

projects-one.jpg

99 ms

projects-two.jpg

projects-two.jpg

100 ms

projects-three.jpg

projects-three.jpg

100 ms

dashboard.png

dashboard.png

264 ms

progress-success.png

progress-success.png

182 ms

progress-info.png

progress-info.png

181 ms

progress-warning.png

progress-warning.png

182 ms

progress-danger.png

progress-danger.png

183 ms

progress-none.png

progress-none.png

262 ms

milestones-one.jpg

milestones-one.jpg

270 ms

milestones-two.jpg

milestones-two.jpg

270 ms

milestones-three.jpg

milestones-three.jpg

272 ms

tasks-one.jpg

tasks-one.jpg

271 ms

tasks-two.jpg

tasks-two.jpg

348 ms

tasks-three.jpg

tasks-three.jpg

350 ms

tasks.png

tasks.png

361 ms

task-one.png

task-one.png

361 ms

task-two.png

task-two.png

363 ms

task-three.png

task-three.png

365 ms

discussion-one.png

discussion-one.png

435 ms

discussion-two.png

discussion-two.png

436 ms

discussion-three.png

discussion-three.png

449 ms

discussion-four.png

discussion-four.png

450 ms

discussions-one.jpg

discussions-one.jpg

450 ms

discussions-two.jpg

discussions-two.jpg

450 ms

discussions-three.jpg

discussions-three.jpg

521 ms

time-one.jpg

time-one.jpg

522 ms

time-two.jpg

time-two.jpg

538 ms

time-three.jpg

time-three.jpg

538 ms

time-one.png

time-one.png

540 ms

time-two.png

time-two.png

539 ms

time-three.png

time-three.png

607 ms

files-one.png

files-one.png

608 ms

ga.js

ga.js

34 ms

files-two.png

files-two.png

559 ms

MViwy4K6e56oHcyeMzjbCQ.ttf

MViwy4K6e56oHcyeMzjbCQ.ttf

49 ms

30 ms

IcoMoon.svg

IcoMoon.svg

628 ms

IcoMoon.svg

IcoMoon.svg

634 ms

files-one.jpg

files-one.jpg

538 ms

files-two.jpg

files-two.jpg

603 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

19 ms

files-three.jpg

files-three.jpg

530 ms

IcoMoon.woff

IcoMoon.woff

91 ms

Accessibility Review

projectfork.net accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

projectfork.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

projectfork.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectfork.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Projectfork.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

projectfork.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Project Fork. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: