4.6 sec in total
595 ms
3.9 sec
115 ms
Visit protectosil.com now to see the best up-to-date Protectosil content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about protectosil.com
PLEASE CHOOSE YOUR REGION!
Visit protectosil.comWe analyzed Protectosil.com page load time and found that the first response time was 595 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
protectosil.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.2 s
99/100
10%
Value1.2 s
100/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.2 s
100/100
10%
595 ms
646 ms
399 ms
222 ms
339 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Protectosil.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Sdc.evonik.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Sdc.evonik.com.
Page size can be reduced by 297.6 kB (79%)
374.9 kB
77.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Protectosil.com main page is 374.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 185.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Protectosil needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 149.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 138.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protectosil.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 138.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (77%)
30
7
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protectosil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
protectosil.com
595 ms
www.protectosil.com
646 ms
home.html
399 ms
mw-styles-centered.css
222 ms
jquery.js
339 ms
jquery.easing.js
232 ms
jquery.dimensions.js
253 ms
jquery.simpletip.js
238 ms
script.js
348 ms
mainscriptv1.js
341 ms
webtrends_sdc.js
350 ms
initial.css
145 ms
grid-centered.css
158 ms
navigation.css
239 ms
content.css
339 ms
mw.css
256 ms
mw-styles-safari.css
129 ms
specific-safari.css
130 ms
mw-specific-safari.css
128 ms
logo.gif
127 ms
logo-protectosil.jpg
160 ms
visual_small_high_globe.jpg
221 ms
clip-m.png
137 ms
bg-clip.png
130 ms
icon-link.gif
128 ms
li-footer.gif
275 ms
icon-print.gif
273 ms
externallinkwhitelisthandler.ashx
241 ms
wtid.js
1093 ms
print.css
128 ms
finders.css
130 ms
specific-ie.css
132 ms
dcs.gif
137 ms
protectosil.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
protectosil.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
protectosil.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protectosil.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Protectosil.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
protectosil.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Protectosil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: