2.3 sec in total
95 ms
1.8 sec
382 ms
Visit eyes.riteaid.com now to see the best up-to-date Eyes Riteaid content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eyes.riteaid.com
Homepage
Visit eyes.riteaid.comWe analyzed Eyes.riteaid.com page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
eyes.riteaid.com performance score
95 ms
679 ms
38 ms
10 ms
12 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eyes.riteaid.com, 85% (71 requests) were made to Marcusa.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) relates to the external source Marcusa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 719.8 kB (48%)
1.5 MB
771.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Eyes.riteaid.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 594.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eyes Riteaid images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 250.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 250.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 413.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyes.riteaid.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 413.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (43%)
77
44
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eyes Riteaid. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eyes.riteaid.com
95 ms
marcusa.com
679 ms
css
38 ms
styles.css
10 ms
grid.css
12 ms
base.css
10 ms
layout.css
12 ms
shortcodes.css
19 ms
magnific-popup.css
11 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
15 ms
enfold_child.css
24 ms
custom.css
16 ms
style.css
30 ms
jquery.js
23 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
16 ms
modernizr.js
31 ms
avia-compat.js
32 ms
scripts.js
30 ms
respond.js
15 ms
scripts.js
31 ms
iframeheight.min.js
30 ms
iframeResizer.min.js
31 ms
style-mobile.css
31 ms
style-tablet.css
32 ms
style-other.css
31 ms
mattstyles.css
32 ms
jquery.form.min.js
30 ms
scripts.js
101 ms
avia.js
107 ms
shortcodes.js
126 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
103 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
105 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
105 ms
comment-reply.min.js
104 ms
header-logo-300x137.png
138 ms
gtm.js
128 ms
hero-desktop-slogan21b.png
109 ms
hero-desktop-brain2.jpg
115 ms
hero-mobile-slogan1b.png
108 ms
FACTORY1-495x400.jpg
109 ms
Desktop_WorkPage-GoldEagle-Storage_MARC2014-495x400.jpg
111 ms
dp4-495x400.jpg
111 ms
logo-navistar.gif
110 ms
logo-trustedchoice.gif
111 ms
logo-tracfone.gif
113 ms
logo-telcel.gif
114 ms
logo-sunbeam.gif
113 ms
logo-ra.gif
113 ms
logo-payless.gif
114 ms
logo-pal.gif
113 ms
logo-oster.gif
115 ms
logo-goldeagle.gif
115 ms
logo-hr.gif
115 ms
logo-huntington.gif
116 ms
logo-mavtv.gif
116 ms
logo-naturemade.gif
115 ms
logo-net10.gif
117 ms
logo-dish.gif
116 ms
logo-depaul.gif
116 ms
logo-cooper.gif
117 ms
logo-carle.gif
118 ms
logo-aha.gif
116 ms
logo-warhol.gif
117 ms
logo-fivestar.gif
118 ms
logo-kaleo.gif
118 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
106 ms
fontello.woff
117 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
113 ms
logo-ha.jpg
114 ms
logo-tv.png
113 ms
maw_logo.png
95 ms
peoples_logo.png
40 ms
header-logo-300x137.png
40 ms
directenergy_logo.png
39 ms
news_blog_images_Superbowl5.jpg
42 ms
news_blog_images_google.jpg
62 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
collect
2 ms
collect
65 ms
print.css
5 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
13 ms
ga-audiences
16 ms
eyes.riteaid.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyes.riteaid.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyes.riteaid.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eyes.riteaid.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eyes Riteaid. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: