2 sec in total
318 ms
1.4 sec
273 ms
Click here to check amazing REA content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about r-e-a.net
The Renewable Energy Association (REA) represents renewable energy producers and promotes the use of all forms of renewable energy in the UK.
Visit r-e-a.netWe analyzed R-e-a.net page load time and found that the first response time was 318 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
r-e-a.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value19.7 s
0/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value700 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.693
7/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
318 ms
154 ms
162 ms
163 ms
243 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original R-e-a.net, 19% (10 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (685 ms) belongs to the original domain R-e-a.net.
Page size can be reduced by 281.6 kB (20%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of R-e-a.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 149.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, REA needs image optimization as it can save up to 149.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 56.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. R-e-a.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (45%)
53
29
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of REA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.r-e-a.net
318 ms
css_reset.css
154 ms
css_text.css
162 ms
css_960.css
163 ms
css_main.css
243 ms
global.js
164 ms
jquery.min.js
6 ms
jssor.slider.mini.v2.js
154 ms
analytics.js
52 ms
bg.gif
93 ms
icon_close.png
91 ms
bg_groupbar5.gif
93 ms
header_blank.gif
93 ms
logo4.gif
164 ms
bg_login2.gif
120 ms
bg_search.gif
152 ms
btn_search2.gif
162 ms
bg_menu.gif
163 ms
carousel_18_1.jpg
575 ms
carousel_1_1.jpg
385 ms
carousel_17_1.jpg
683 ms
carousel_6_1.jpg
605 ms
carousel_7_1.jpg
574 ms
carousel_14_1.jpg
574 ms
carousel_3_1.jpg
492 ms
welcome_bars.gif
569 ms
default_arrow.jpg
646 ms
web_design_-_social_facebook_box_blue1.png
656 ms
web_design_-_twittericon_2011_120x67.jpg
655 ms
icon_greenarrow.gif
654 ms
sponsor_8_1.jpg
685 ms
widgets.js
28 ms
collect
23 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
19 ms
syndication
89 ms
514369188001878018
146 ms
proxy.jpg
17 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
5 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
7 ms
zG2usB_7_normal.jpg
124 ms
K5LQGxxT_normal.jpeg
151 ms
11c1e4abaa2ecd83691fe107b6cbf573_normal.png
180 ms
93a9bb851d6ba8a2f48c41484c8a414e_normal.jpeg
207 ms
49Z53GfT_normal.jpeg
227 ms
c127c7eebc0bcc3d38ef023196345a7f_normal.jpeg
231 ms
CdmCDjJXIAAYORC.jpg:small
310 ms
Cdl1sxEWEAIWOMF.jpg:small
235 ms
CdloS6YW8AA_5mM.jpg:small
324 ms
Cdlni6GWoAAaGjN.jpg:small
326 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
28 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
70 ms
proxy.jpg
4 ms
jot.html
1 ms
css_print.css
77 ms
r-e-a.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
r-e-a.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
r-e-a.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R-e-a.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that R-e-a.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
r-e-a.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of REA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: