Tools & Wizards About Us
radfordtransit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

radfordtransit.com

Passio GO!

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

933 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

267 ms

radfordtransit.com screenshot

About Website

Visit radfordtransit.com now to see the best up-to-date Radfordtransit content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about radfordtransit.com

Passio Transit Systems

Visit radfordtransit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Radfordtransit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 933 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radfordtransit.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.radfordtransit.com

933 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

187 ms

dashicons.min.css

249 ms

wunderground.css

140 ms

css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Radfordtransit.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (933 ms) belongs to the original domain Radfordtransit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 632.2 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Radfordtransit.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 839.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 45.5 kB

  • Original 57.5 kB
  • After minification 55.0 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 839.5 kB
  • After minification 824.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radfordtransit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 196.2 kB

  • Original 357.2 kB
  • After minification 331.5 kB
  • After compression 160.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 196.2 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 375.2 kB

  • Original 493.0 kB
  • After minification 413.2 kB
  • After compression 117.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radfordtransit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 375.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (67%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radfordtransit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.radfordtransit.com

www.radfordtransit.com

933 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

187 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

249 ms

wunderground.css

wunderground.css

140 ms

css

css

25 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

249 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

139 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

414 ms

styles.css

styles.css

188 ms

style.css

style.css

189 ms

style.css

style.css

307 ms

style.css

style.css

250 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

251 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

308 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

370 ms

jquery-2.2.1.min.js

jquery-2.2.1.min.js

499 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

312 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

367 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

368 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

374 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

429 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

429 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

430 ms

jquery-migrate-1.3.0.min.js

jquery-migrate-1.3.0.min.js

433 ms

element.js

element.js

35 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

374 ms

public.css

public.css

395 ms

wpstarter-functions.js

wpstarter-functions.js

393 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

542 ms

wpforge-functions.js

wpforge-functions.js

445 ms

ditty-news-ticker-images.js

ditty-news-ticker-images.js

446 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

7 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

57 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

457 ms

load-foundation.js

load-foundation.js

456 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

455 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

593 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

4 ms

radford-transit1.png

radford-transit1.png

63 ms

trip-planner-2.jpg

trip-planner-2.jpg

364 ms

trip-planner-3.jpg

trip-planner-3.jpg

434 ms

trip-planner.jpg

trip-planner.jpg

364 ms

nt_cloudy.gif

nt_cloudy.gif

148 ms

wundergroundLogo_4c_horz.png

wundergroundLogo_4c_horz.png

150 ms

new-monthly-pass-tickets.png

new-monthly-pass-tickets.png

243 ms

radford-trasnit-next-bus-300x126.jpg

radford-trasnit-next-bus-300x126.jpg

244 ms

translateelement.css

translateelement.css

58 ms

main.js

main.js

135 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

22 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

38 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

212 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

30 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

208 ms

VerbLight-webfont.woff

VerbLight-webfont.woff

208 ms

VerbRegular-webfont.woff

VerbRegular-webfont.woff

209 ms

element_main.js

element_main.js

64 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

82 ms

services.css

services.css

83 ms

translate_24dp.png

translate_24dp.png

37 ms

l

l

41 ms

g.gif

g.gif

27 ms

googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png

googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png

29 ms

bg_direction_nav.png

bg_direction_nav.png

111 ms

googlelogo_color_68x28dp.png

googlelogo_color_68x28dp.png

3 ms

cleardot.gif

cleardot.gif

36 ms

te_ctrl3.gif

te_ctrl3.gif

20 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

26 ms

Accessibility Review

radfordtransit.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

radfordtransit.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

radfordtransit.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radfordtransit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radfordtransit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

radfordtransit.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Radfordtransit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: