4.1 sec in total
611 ms
2.8 sec
646 ms
Click here to check amazing Rankscanner content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rankscanner.com
Mit navn er Micky Weis. Mit team og jeg sidder klar til at rykke jeres digitale strategi til næste niveau. Online marketing med hjerte og ærlighed. ❤
Visit rankscanner.comWe analyzed Rankscanner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 611 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rankscanner.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
611 ms
256 ms
89 ms
95 ms
117 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Rankscanner.com, 35% (29 requests) were made to Rankscanner-2161.kxcdn.com and 27% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (851 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (65%)
3.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rankscanner.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rankscanner images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 979.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 979.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 968.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rankscanner.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 968.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (74%)
58
15
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rankscanner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rankscanner.com
611 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
256 ms
dashicons.min.css
89 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
95 ms
css
117 ms
style.css
291 ms
settings.css
315 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
115 ms
arconix-faq.css
307 ms
integrity-light.css
85 ms
style.css
74 ms
css
118 ms
fa-icon-classes.css
297 ms
js_composer.min.css
557 ms
jquery.js
93 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
633 ms
q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js
338 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
630 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
482 ms
x-head.min.js
85 ms
cs-head.min.js
390 ms
livicons-1.4.min.js
790 ms
raphael.min.js
437 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
css
28 ms
core.min.js
18 ms
widget.min.js
19 ms
mouse.min.js
18 ms
resizable.min.js
19 ms
draggable.min.js
489 ms
button.min.js
563 ms
position.min.js
18 ms
dialog.min.js
19 ms
wpdialog.min.js
18 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
355 ms
custom.js
509 ms
idle-timer.min.js
510 ms
jquery.form.min.js
556 ms
scripts.js
558 ms
x-body.min.js
20 ms
comment-reply.min.js
21 ms
cs-body.min.js
599 ms
wp-embed.min.js
19 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
557 ms
Logo15_7.png
48 ms
Sky1-1024x6401.jpg
41 ms
Logo1_White_No_text.png
39 ms
RankscannerRoundLogo_notext.png
39 ms
Macbook-Flat-Mockup2.png
43 ms
Logo15_7_green.png
41 ms
seo-techniques-862x482.jpg
101 ms
linkbuilding-862x482.jpg
90 ms
OnPage-SEO-Ranking-862x482.jpg
92 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
146 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
698 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
757 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
756 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
756 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
756 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
851 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
848 ms
fKnfV28XkldRW297cFLeqfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
850 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
849 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
47 ms
analytics.js
744 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
212 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
207 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
209 ms
O4NhV7_qs9r9seTo7fnsVKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
169 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
166 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi9-WlPSxbfiI49GsXo3q0g.ttf
182 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxpZ7xm-Bj30Bj2KNdXDzSZg.ttf
179 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxne1Pd76Vl7zRpE7NLJQ7XU.ttf
180 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxiBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf
171 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxg89PwPrYLaRFJ-HNCU9NbA.ttf
179 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
181 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
310 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
311 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
311 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
311 ms
collect
71 ms
rankscanner.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
rankscanner.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rankscanner.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rankscanner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rankscanner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rankscanner.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rankscanner. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: