9.3 sec in total
4 sec
5.1 sec
158 ms
Welcome to rcb.res.in homepage info - get ready to check Rcb best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about rcb.res.in
Visit rcb.res.inWe analyzed Rcb.res.in page load time and found that the first response time was 4 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rcb.res.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
24/100
10%
4017 ms
76 ms
202 ms
133 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Rcb.res.in, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to S10.histats.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rcb.res.in.
Page size can be reduced by 862.5 kB (39%)
2.2 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Rcb.res.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 501.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rcb needs image optimization as it can save up to 501.9 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 183.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 183.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rcb.res.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (26%)
54
40
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rcb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rcb.res.in
4017 ms
stylesheet.css
76 ms
bootstrap.css
202 ms
li-scroller.css
133 ms
fantasy-swap-colorbox.css
134 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
221 ms
bootstrap.min.js
139 ms
jquery.jfontsize-1.0-min.js
141 ms
jcarousellite_1.0.1.js
238 ms
jquery.cycle2.js
238 ms
jquery.li-scroller.1.0.js
242 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
242 ms
blink.js
272 ms
js-misc.js
274 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
logo.png
574 ms
building.jpg
140 ms
DI_logo.png
77 ms
navbg.jpg
75 ms
menus_hover1.jpg
73 ms
ccp4_IMG_6599.JPG
170 ms
ccp4_IMG_6612.JPG
145 ms
IMG_7958_1.JPG
206 ms
IMG_7969_1.JPG
279 ms
IMG_8012_1.JPG
281 ms
IMG_8016_1.JPG
283 ms
21.jpg
238 ms
12.jpg
404 ms
7.jpg
432 ms
8.jpg
472 ms
41.jpg
414 ms
42.jpg
412 ms
IMG_6229.jpg
543 ms
IMG_6246.jpg
543 ms
40.jpg
544 ms
21_2.jpg
559 ms
30.jpg
653 ms
33.jpg
674 ms
34.jpg
655 ms
19.jpg
654 ms
20.jpg
655 ms
2.jpg
656 ms
3.jpg
676 ms
9.jpg
681 ms
10.jpg
680 ms
js15.js
575 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
689 ms
collect
12 ms
2792469.php
56 ms
socialmedia.png
72 ms
cc_601.js
4 ms
1.jpg
77 ms
4.jpg
75 ms
7.jpg
76 ms
12.jpg
74 ms
13.jpg
72 ms
rcb.res.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">
rcb.res.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
rcb.res.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rcb.res.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rcb.res.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rcb.res.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rcb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: