2.6 sec in total
203 ms
2.1 sec
297 ms
Click here to check amazing RCL content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rcl.com
Welcome to our site. We offer the very best in Managed IT Services and IT Support for small businesses in Texas.
Visit rcl.comWe analyzed Rcl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 203 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
rcl.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value910 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.833
4/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
203 ms
863 ms
85 ms
83 ms
126 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Rcl.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (863 ms) belongs to the original domain Rcl.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (67%)
2.5 MB
822.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Rcl.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 113.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RCL needs image optimization as it can save up to 113.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 433.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rcl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 433.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (69%)
83
26
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RCL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rcl.com
203 ms
www.rcl.com
863 ms
menu-037368badee7edf623f742fecf84e8d5.css
85 ms
grid-responsive.css
83 ms
bootstrap.css
126 ms
master-da39e2a8514d7678b1913dac67ff9fc9.css
134 ms
section-da39e2a8514d7678b1913dac67ff9fc9.css
105 ms
mediaqueries.css
96 ms
rtl.css
123 ms
thirdparty-k2.css
129 ms
rt_hexeris-custom.css
141 ms
headlines.css
144 ms
jquery-ui.css
171 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
165 ms
joomconnect_login.css
175 ms
tabs.css
177 ms
forms.css
180 ms
forms_tabs.css
186 ms
modules.css
206 ms
lists.css
212 ms
mosaic.css
208 ms
showcase.css
209 ms
user_widget.css.php
458 ms
jquery.min.js
27 ms
jquerynoconflict.js
237 ms
mootools-core.js
283 ms
core.js
245 ms
caption.js
243 ms
mootools-more.js
325 ms
browser-engines.js
282 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
285 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
286 ms
responsive.js
325 ms
api.js
32 ms
mootools-mobile.js
325 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
327 ms
roksprocket.js
325 ms
headlines.js
376 ms
jquery-ui.js
510 ms
joomconnect.js
391 ms
joomconnect-ui.js
297 ms
mod_jc_analytics.js
296 ms
tabs.js
327 ms
jcform.js
305 ms
jcformemailexist.js
310 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
332 ms
roksprocket.request.js
385 ms
lists.js
384 ms
lists.js
379 ms
moofx.js
400 ms
mosaic.js
373 ms
mosaic.js
367 ms
features.js
364 ms
showcase.js
366 ms
recaptcha__en.js
75 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
sketch.jpg
147 ms
myaccount.png
146 ms
email.png
147 ms
helpdesk.png
146 ms
blue_trigger_l.png
146 ms
blue_trigger_m.png
143 ms
widgetarrow.gif
147 ms
blue_trigger_r.png
149 ms
img7.jpg
132 ms
logo.png
123 ms
dark.png
122 ms
new-computer.png
124 ms
new-round-the-clock.png
333 ms
new-clock.png
315 ms
compass-new.png
167 ms
wearemoving.jpg
332 ms
managed-services.jpg
166 ms
cloud-solutions.jpg
333 ms
security-services.jpg
331 ms
who-are-we.jpg
332 ms
our-difference.jpg
332 ms
employment.jpg
363 ms
free-whitepaper.jpg
358 ms
free-consultation.jpg
359 ms
facebook.png
366 ms
twitter.png
369 ms
rss.png
360 ms
poweredbyjoomconnect-white.png
403 ms
eau_sans_book-webfont.woff
403 ms
collect
34 ms
collect
209 ms
eau_sans_bold-webfont.woff
312 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
342 ms
rcl.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rcl.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rcl.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rcl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rcl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rcl.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RCL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: