2.4 sec in total
266 ms
1.6 sec
564 ms
Visit redesigncase.com now to see the best up-to-date Redesigncase content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about redesigncase.com
See related links to what you are looking for.
Visit redesigncase.comWe analyzed Redesigncase.com page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
redesigncase.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
266 ms
99 ms
173 ms
202 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Redesigncase.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Redesigncase.com.
Page size can be reduced by 645.6 kB (36%)
1.8 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Redesigncase.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 896.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Redesigncase images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 317.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 317.2 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 235.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Redesigncase.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 235.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (48%)
61
32
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Redesigncase. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
redesigncase.com
266 ms
bY3hCsIwDIRfyKwMBJ-na2OJdK3mUre9vZ0gouxfuPvuy-iMYTLXIj6DFomJzUkJuUWGyzKpV-nXtCJLZKWzuz0a6zZ8ktN46PAAG1wAjuo-CrWYD0bXqjNdvj_3BWzLjA7dfWJ6Ci-gUFv50b6hYZbSOQStOZOppMTKkaa6dtc_jR1_AQ.css
99 ms
M9APcjYyMDTTT0_NSy3KTM7PK0ZiAgA.css
173 ms
bc3BDcIwDIXhhRrccmABFkBs4KSmiZTEUexQuj3hwKGUkyV_v_RGuF_P43QB0S3SMEElR1lNYVExa5gX0n7UG_Ut2YwhCpRmY3A9jmHxavllSmwCTgTE48wrzeA4cu10SiEP43flk1hmFa1YjvTgPo0rCSc6KuaQUP9AqaS63Twr7yHhb1pJCmcJT9r_XRPl9AY.css
202 ms
css
30 ms
M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzdAz1czLTM0qS8it0C3JKi_WziqGq9JLzc_KLgOJ6hnqmepZATXkA.js
192 ms
load.sumome.com
362 ms
loader.js
134 ms
vertical-m.css
167 ms
M9APcjYyMDTTzyrWzyosTS2q1DFAEkrKzy8pLilKLNDLzcwDAA.js
264 ms
adsbygoogle.js
7 ms
M9APcjYyMDTTzyrWzyosTS2q1CsoSi0pqQzIyC_J1zHAlM4sBkoUpOrlZuahSOcmogmU55djKIKaUZKYFJyTmZLqX1qiV2aoZwwA.js
156 ms
45b277421b4a451f32a3596d0356ea41c270e277.js
48 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPAqLC0tSiSj2QjF5uZh4A.js
261 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPKtYvTi7KLCgpBgA.js
263 ms
functions.js
1087 ms
M9RPySwuLC3WTc7PzU3NK9EtriwuSc3Vz01NyUzUzyrWT84vzSsBAA.js
261 ms
logo.png
86 ms
Material-UI-Kit_thumb-300x236.jpg
118 ms
valentine-icon-set-thumb-300x236.jpg
111 ms
Photoshop-Keyboard-Shortcuts-300x236.jpg
117 ms
Color-palette-thumb-300x236.jpg
108 ms
material-design-login-300x236.jpg
256 ms
Material-UI_VOL05_071-300x236.jpg
357 ms
social_watch_psd01-300x236.jpg
183 ms
Look@_login_thumb-300x236.jpg
359 ms
material_Thumb_and-300x236.jpg
181 ms
fEATURED-300x236.jpg
410 ms
Agriculture-icons-thumb-300x236.jpg
357 ms
Featured_Lumia-300x236.png
408 ms
Profile-thumb01-300x236.jpg
480 ms
Flat_form_featured_image-300x236.png
408 ms
thumb1-300x236.jpg
407 ms
Zeroo_show01-300x236.jpg
478 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
partner_bg.jpg
435 ms
collect
30 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
445 ms
ca-pub-2404481621760347.js
166 ms
zrt_lookup.html
158 ms
show_ads_impl.js
92 ms
chart-bar.png
379 ms
collect
250 ms
partner_bg.png
557 ms
ads
528 ms
osd.js
87 ms
contact.png
366 ms
ads
285 ms
ads
329 ms
css
52 ms
arrow_white.png
201 ms
ZlUPZyrSF-_hj9
39 ms
ads
373 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
24 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
39 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
49 ms
m_js_controller.js
24 ms
abg.js
39 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
200 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
65 ms
s
51 ms
x_button_blue2.png
75 ms
4342624530196300720
165 ms
favicon
281 ms
favicon
265 ms
favicon
274 ms
favicon
250 ms
favicon
261 ms
favicon
260 ms
count.js
220 ms
ajax-loader.gif
178 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
11 ms
redesigncase.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
redesigncase.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
redesigncase.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redesigncase.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Redesigncase.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
redesigncase.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Redesigncase. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: