3 sec in total
228 ms
2.6 sec
166 ms
Visit remotexs.in now to see the best up-to-date Remotexs content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about remotexs.in
Visit remotexs.inWe analyzed Remotexs.in page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
remotexs.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.053
98/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
228 ms
104 ms
190 ms
200 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Remotexs.in, 9% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Remotexs.in.
Page size can be reduced by 847.4 kB (33%)
2.6 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Remotexs.in main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 103.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remotexs images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 343.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 343.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 362.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remotexs.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 362.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (43%)
40
23
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remotexs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
remotexs.in
228 ms
css_ogjvJnfni1_P_WxvXAHlUOgCs860b3ip9DNMapcIGeM.css
104 ms
css_-SM7QcYEeFxjGaVEQB3DaYqasCPcR80EP0VSbwE9KsY.css
190 ms
css_bKxJTeCzE5GO6HCLNeLxFQDWfBbsxNroZ0zoeQXM93M.css
200 ms
css
38 ms
css_tw_BHW5rxyU2zt9VKqfqnc5cxl5NEWZ9OeFB4nLT7bs.css
414 ms
js_0gj6QcpfRH2jzTbCQqf7kEkm4MXY0UA_sRhwPc8jC1o.js
606 ms
js_ck2x9C0u2rQnolIRrig_DvcLP6xtjCzW2DUc7ewG1oI.js
315 ms
js_T1vuG2UzVnSabRcPFC01xP7umfd35HIO8o-200SPbAQ.js
314 ms
js_vCvbzTc_RxlvhDKcGduB_rzAzEVmVOpmrif0ulj81Kg.js
376 ms
widgets.js
31 ms
js_3wUMbu0UFS2nnO5nqOLxymE4OYVtUwe6UqvgpQ9F0MU.js
866 ms
webfont.js
41 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
linkid.js
6 ms
collect
3 ms
collect
57 ms
arrow.png
185 ms
css
93 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
57 ms
eclat_0.png
111 ms
footer_brochure_0.png
190 ms
decision.png
112 ms
users.png
408 ms
graphs.png
508 ms
img2.png
869 ms
rxs.png
206 ms
clientlogo1.png
718 ms
clientlogo2.png
661 ms
clientlogo3.png
1024 ms
eclatlogo.png
508 ms
Remotexs%20icon%20logo.png
609 ms
iGroup.jpg
610 ms
light-timer-glow.png
710 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1105 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
37 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ14nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
38 ms
syndication
135 ms
483950758379802624
158 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
6 ms
SCJ8lcLktXFnX90KWp_oHPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
37 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
3 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
5 ms
Qqf-bx-6_normal.png
32 ms
jot
87 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
104 ms
remotexs.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
remotexs.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
remotexs.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remotexs.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remotexs.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
remotexs.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Remotexs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: