2.3 sec in total
215 ms
1.8 sec
365 ms
Visit resultchecker.info now to see the best up-to-date Resultchecker content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about resultchecker.info
Visit resultchecker.infoWe analyzed Resultchecker.info page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
resultchecker.info performance score
215 ms
11 ms
14 ms
18 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Resultchecker.info, 11% (7 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Resources.infolinks.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (568 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 541.8 kB (61%)
891.7 kB
349.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Resultchecker.info main page is 891.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 698.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Resultchecker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 414.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 414.7 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resultchecker.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (52%)
60
29
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resultchecker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
resultdate.net
215 ms
font-awesome.min.css
11 ms
global.css
14 ms
css3.css
18 ms
jquery.js
63 ms
jquery.plugins.min.js
62 ms
general.js
60 ms
responsivemenu.js
62 ms
adsbygoogle.js
59 ms
infolinks_main.js
60 ms
buttons_bg.png
140 ms
collapse.png
137 ms
task.php
427 ms
user_sync.html
139 ms
usersyncup-an.html
134 ms
ice.js
154 ms
analytics.js
124 ms
ca-pub-6140027927628399.js
172 ms
zrt_lookup.html
247 ms
show_ads_impl.js
174 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
142 ms
showad.js
128 ms
collect
111 ms
14584384927221
114 ms
PugMaster
137 ms
ads
568 ms
mapuid
65 ms
osd.js
62 ms
FBLIS.html
63 ms
doq.htm
172 ms
pixel
50 ms
Pug
52 ms
usersync.aspx
53 ms
sdk.js
484 ms
ads
500 ms
Pug
40 ms
pixel
27 ms
Pug
29 ms
Pug
24 ms
Pug
20 ms
Pug
19 ms
Pug
18 ms
loader.gif
325 ms
getads.htm
225 ms
loader-bg.png
78 ms
m_js_controller.js
102 ms
abg.js
125 ms
Adobe_CCT_Pros_GlobalTeams_300x250_img.jpg
203 ms
dvtp_src.js
170 ms
292 ms
xd_arbiter.php
277 ms
xd_arbiter.php
452 ms
favicon
298 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
264 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
83 ms
s
73 ms
x_button_blue2.png
65 ms
dvtp_src_internal26.js
34 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
184 ms
t2tv7.html
288 ms
visit.js
181 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
46 ms
xd_arbiter.php
109 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
22 ms
avs5639.js
15 ms
resultchecker.info SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resultchecker.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resultchecker.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
resultchecker.info
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Resultchecker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: