8.2 sec in total
3 sec
4.8 sec
400 ms
Click here to check amazing Review Adviser content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about review-adviser.com
Your partner in world reviews Companies Service consumers Add a review Top categories Construction Companies Medical Centers Crypto Exchanges Forex Brokers
Visit review-adviser.comWe analyzed Review-adviser.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
review-adviser.com performance score
2958 ms
80 ms
124 ms
165 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Review-adviser.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Review-adviser.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (57%)
1.9 MB
843.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Review-adviser.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 732.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 140.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Adviser images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 296.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 296.9 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 632.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Review-adviser.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 632.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (48%)
82
43
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Adviser. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
review-adviser.com
2958 ms
webfont.js
80 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
124 ms
advanced-responsive-video-embedder-public.css
165 ms
style.css
165 ms
styles.css
166 ms
dashicons.min.css
309 ms
frontend.css
169 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
208 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
257 ms
style.css
553 ms
font-awesome.min.css
326 ms
prettyPhoto.css
345 ms
js_composer.css
880 ms
jquery.js
560 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
400 ms
ajax-loop.js
414 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
jquery.form.min.js
405 ms
scripts.js
464 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
689 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
499 ms
modernizr.js
548 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
584 ms
selectivizr.min.js
609 ms
placeholders.min.js
614 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
634 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
673 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
694 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
697 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
723 ms
custom.js
770 ms
jquery.sonar.min.js
771 ms
lazy-load.js
794 ms
js_composer_front.js
793 ms
LOGO-11.png
120 ms
Sony_Xperia_Z5-compared-198x125.jpg
118 ms
Apple-iPhone-6-design-concept-21-198x125.jpg
118 ms
huawei_logo_686x380-198x125.jpg
118 ms
Xiaomi-Mi-5-specs-198x125.jpg
118 ms
amazon-fire-tablet-198x125.jpg
117 ms
amazon-fire-hd-8-198x125.jpg
327 ms
Google-Nexus-6-2015-681x382-555x379.jpg
328 ms
amazon-fire-tablet-272x187.jpg
329 ms
apple-watch-1-272x187.jpg
328 ms
google-272x187.jpg
327 ms
western-digital-555x379.jpg
374 ms
oneplus-one-272x187.jpg
331 ms
Apple-iPhone-6-design-concept-21-272x187.jpg
330 ms
Amazon-Logo-272x187.jpg
331 ms
facebook-partners-with-nasscom-555x379.jpg
329 ms
mark-zuckerberg-272x187.jpg
331 ms
huawei_logo_686x380-272x187.jpg
374 ms
Huawei-Nexus-6P-31-272x187.jpg
374 ms
Sony_Xperia_Z5-compared-350x220.jpg
374 ms
Apple-iPhone-6-design-concept-21-100x65.jpg
374 ms
huawei_logo_686x380-100x65.jpg
375 ms
Xiaomi-Mi-5-specs-100x65.jpg
631 ms
official-apple-logo-high-resolution-wallpaper-3.jpg-100x65.png
631 ms
amazon-fire-tablet-350x220.jpg
632 ms
amazon-fire-hd-8-100x65.jpg
637 ms
Google-Nexus-6-2015-681x382-350x220.jpg
634 ms
apple-watch-1-100x65.jpg
635 ms
google-100x65.jpg
651 ms
western-digital-100x65.jpg
649 ms
oneplus-one-100x65.jpg
651 ms
surface-book-front-back-100620178-orig-350x220.jpg
648 ms
acer_v15_nitro_a_0087-350x220.jpg
649 ms
css
35 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
690 ms
ca-pub-2629267101115528.js
276 ms
zrt_lookup.html
163 ms
show_ads_impl.js
105 ms
ads
429 ms
osd.js
29 ms
ads
262 ms
m_js_controller.js
112 ms
abg.js
135 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
181 ms
15398280909241153302
168 ms
favicon
129 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
59 ms
s
46 ms
x_button_blue2.png
6 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
12 ms
review-adviser.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Review-adviser.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Review-adviser.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
review-adviser.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Review Adviser. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: