Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

rhuno.com

Rhuno.com

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

238 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

256 ms

rhuno.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rhuno.com homepage info - get ready to check Rhuno best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rhuno.com

Visit rhuno.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rhuno.com page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rhuno.com performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.99

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rhuno.com

238 ms

css

59 ms

css

70 ms

style4.6.css

181 ms

folioData.js

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Rhuno.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (645 ms) belongs to the original domain Rhuno.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.0 kB (5%)

Content Size

535.1 kB

After Optimization

507.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Rhuno.com main page is 535.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 502.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 8.9 kB
  • After minification 7.7 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 502.0 kB
  • After minification 498.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rhuno images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 18.2 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 6.0 kB
  • After minification 4.9 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhuno.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhuno. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rhuno.com accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

rhuno.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rhuno.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhuno.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rhuno.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rhuno. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: