Tools & Wizards About Us
ribbitracing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

Page Load Speed

924 ms in total

First Response

232 ms

Resources Loaded

554 ms

Page Rendered

138 ms

ribbitracing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ribbitracing.com now to see the best up-to-date Ribbit Racing content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ribbitracing.com

Visit ribbitracing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ribbitracing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 232 ms and then it took 692 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ribbitracing.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,900 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.123

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ribbitracing.com

232 ms

style.css

69 ms

DRFLive_Top_021316.jpg

35 ms

show_ads.js

5 ms

Sprite%2012.jpg

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Ribbitracing.com, 29% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 21% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (232 ms) belongs to the original domain Ribbitracing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

92.5 kB

After Optimization

80.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ribbitracing.com main page is 92.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 65.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 11.5 kB
  • After minification 11.4 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 65.2 kB
  • After minification 63.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ribbit Racing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 109 B

  • Original 14.5 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 935 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 856 B
  • After compression 297 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ribbitracing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 935 B or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (23%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ribbit Racing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ribbitracing.com

ribbitracing.com

232 ms

style.css

style.css

69 ms

DRFLive_Top_021316.jpg

DRFLive_Top_021316.jpg

35 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

5 ms

Sprite%2012.jpg

Sprite%2012.jpg

188 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

31 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

40 ms

livewebpicks.jpg

livewebpicks.jpg

112 ms

tumblr.png

tumblr.png

125 ms

ads

ads

136 ms

ads

ads

139 ms

ads

ads

98 ms

osd.js

osd.js

27 ms

abg.js

abg.js

30 ms

Accessibility Review

ribbitracing.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

Best Practices

ribbitracing.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ribbitracing.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ribbitracing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ribbitracing.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ribbitracing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ribbit Racing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: