5.6 sec in total
1.6 sec
3.8 sec
177 ms
Click here to check amazing Rice Writer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ricewriter.com
The domain name RiceWriter.com is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit ricewriter.comWe analyzed Ricewriter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ricewriter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0.9 s
100/100
25%
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.9 s
100/100
10%
1590 ms
156 ms
210 ms
215 ms
200 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Ricewriter.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ricewriter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (82%)
3.9 MB
719.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ricewriter.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rice Writer needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.9 MB or 82% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 118.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ricewriter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (46%)
50
27
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rice Writer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ricewriter.com
1590 ms
style.css
156 ms
public.css
210 ms
prettyPhoto.css
215 ms
plugins.css
200 ms
themeblvd.css
232 ms
nav.min.css
198 ms
theme.min.css
250 ms
menus.min.css
305 ms
boxed-light.min.css
315 ms
light.min.css
325 ms
responsive.min.css
312 ms
jquery.js
390 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
382 ms
jquery.external.lib.js
427 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.pack.js
420 ms
public.js
414 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
459 ms
superfish.js
507 ms
flexslider.js
501 ms
roundabout.js
508 ms
alyeska.min.js
529 ms
wp_eStore_style.css
530 ms
wp_eStore_custom_style.css
562 ms
eStore_read_form.js
600 ms
css
24 ms
footer-blue.png
156 ms
glass-blue.jpg
167 ms
social-media-dark.png
137 ms
main-top-boxed-light.png
138 ms
menu-flip-dark.png
142 ms
search-popup-trigger-dark.png
143 ms
main-boxed-light.png
243 ms
P1040987-Copy.jpg
464 ms
P1040990-Copy.jpg
386 ms
DSC_0027.jpg
1531 ms
rice-012-21.jpg
487 ms
rice-047-2.jpg
377 ms
rice-256-2.jpg
508 ms
rice-271-2.jpg
573 ms
rice-280-2.jpg
491 ms
clock.png
989 ms
mobile.png
991 ms
computer.png
987 ms
loader.gif
982 ms
divider.png
999 ms
main-bottom-boxed-light.png
1072 ms
text-gradient.png
1051 ms
text-gradient-footer.png
1054 ms
slideshow-dots.png
91 ms
slideshow-arrows.png
95 ms
ricewriter.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ricewriter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
ricewriter.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ricewriter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ricewriter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ricewriter.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rice Writer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: