5.7 sec in total
1.4 sec
4.1 sec
177 ms
Visit richmondhillcountryclub.com now to see the best up-to-date Richmond Hill Country Club content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richmondhillcountryclub.com
Visit richmondhillcountryclub.comWe analyzed Richmondhillcountryclub.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
richmondhillcountryclub.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.217
57/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
1390 ms
129 ms
254 ms
129 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Richmondhillcountryclub.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Richmondhillcountryclub.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (36%)
6.4 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Richmondhillcountryclub.com main page is 6.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 245.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richmond Hill Country Club images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 619.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 619.5 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richmondhillcountryclub.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (75%)
51
13
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richmond Hill Country Club. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.richmondhillcountryclub.com
1390 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
129 ms
style.css
254 ms
style.css
129 ms
styles.css
130 ms
settings.css
192 ms
dynamic-captions.css
251 ms
static-captions.css
193 ms
theme-styles.min.css
381 ms
theme-icons.min.css
431 ms
css
22 ms
css
34 ms
style.css
257 ms
custom.css
255 ms
js_composer.css
899 ms
jquery.js
272 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
211 ms
flags.js
214 ms
jquery.cookie.js
282 ms
script.js
282 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
374 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
316 ms
head-scripts.js
314 ms
www.richmondhillcountryclub.com
814 ms
element.js
32 ms
jquery.form.min.js
372 ms
scripts.js
434 ms
core.min.js
372 ms
widget.min.js
431 ms
tabs.min.js
445 ms
comment-reply.min.js
436 ms
scripts-vendors-ck.js
685 ms
smoothscroll.js
560 ms
jquerytransit.js
500 ms
js_composer_front.js
588 ms
theme-styles.min-blessed1.css
458 ms
ga.js
44 ms
RHCC-web-logo.png
434 ms
rhcc-new-web-logo.png
72 ms
rhcc-home-background.jpg
246 ms
483-Leah-Linsday-copy.jpg
514 ms
tennis-2-copy-copy.jpg
507 ms
gym-copy-copy.jpg
452 ms
2014-10-copy.jpg
246 ms
pool-4-copy.jpg
321 ms
translateelement.css
51 ms
main.js
214 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
26 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
26 ms
boeCNmOCCh-EWFLSfVffDg.woff
27 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
27 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
27 ms
MWVf-Rwh4GLQVBEwbyI61Q.woff
27 ms
fonts-icomoon.woff
227 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
292 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
element_main.js
33 ms
translate_24dp.png
16 ms
l
39 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
11 ms
richmondhillcountryclub.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
richmondhillcountryclub.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
richmondhillcountryclub.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richmondhillcountryclub.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richmondhillcountryclub.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richmondhillcountryclub.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richmond Hill Country Club. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: