8 sec in total
2.4 sec
5.3 sec
311 ms
Click here to check amazing Rigel Networks content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rigelnetworks.com
Rigel Networks is a pioneer in end-to-end IT solutions, managed IT services, software consulting, and wholesale voice and SMS services offered to various industries.
Visit rigelnetworks.comWe analyzed Rigelnetworks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rigelnetworks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value440 ms
63/100
30%
Value1.855
0/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
2396 ms
130 ms
132 ms
154 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Rigelnetworks.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rigelnetworks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 558.9 kB (28%)
2.0 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rigelnetworks.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 152.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rigel Networks needs image optimization as it can save up to 152.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 262.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rigelnetworks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (58%)
65
27
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rigel Networks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rigelnetworks.com
2396 ms
menu.css
130 ms
tabs.css
132 ms
styles.css
154 ms
font-awesome.min.css
152 ms
wplcstyle.css
155 ms
style.css
156 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
252 ms
quick-contact-form.css
256 ms
jquery-ui.css
67 ms
jquery.js
326 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
263 ms
include.js
267 ms
main.js
270 ms
jquery-1.12.js
449 ms
css
65 ms
shailan-dropdown.min.css
386 ms
web20.css
393 ms
tabs.js
401 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
401 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
466 ms
jquery.form.min.js
536 ms
scripts.js
537 ms
mobilemenu.js
537 ms
core.min.js
564 ms
datepicker.min.js
583 ms
quick-contact-form.js
590 ms
effect.min.js
641 ms
quick-range-slider.js
651 ms
wp-embed.min.js
667 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
552 ms
css
24 ms
logo.png
466 ms
search.png
466 ms
social.png
466 ms
bullet2.png
467 ms
Enterprise-Solution.jpg
487 ms
new-1.jpg
507 ms
Mobile.jpg
578 ms
Virtualization.jpg
574 ms
Big-Data.jpg
641 ms
RIM.jpg
740 ms
pdf8.png
818 ms
download-icon.png
630 ms
pdf1.png
819 ms
pdf9.png
1047 ms
pdf3.png
889 ms
pdf2.png
1089 ms
pdf4.png
1003 ms
blog-icon1-1.jpg
1019 ms
blog-icon3.jpg
952 ms
blog-icon2.jpg
1088 ms
certification-bg.png
1087 ms
certi1.png
1133 ms
certi2.png
1152 ms
certi3-1.png
1171 ms
certi5.png
1211 ms
follow.png
1219 ms
loading_spinner.gif
1195 ms
top-button.png
1239 ms
Roboto-Light.ttf
1535 ms
Roboto-Regular.ttf
1494 ms
Roboto-Medium.ttf
1557 ms
Roboto-Bold.ttf
1527 ms
top-arrow.png
1219 ms
bx_loader.gif
1257 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
bx-prev.png
1302 ms
bx-next.png
1343 ms
collect
14 ms
tabs-bg.png
1176 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
rigelnetworks.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rigelnetworks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rigelnetworks.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rigelnetworks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rigelnetworks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rigelnetworks.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rigel Networks. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: