Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

rigert.com

Thomas Rigert – www.rigert.com: seit dem 5. Februar 2001

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

406 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

rigert.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rigert content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rigert.com

Visit rigert.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rigert.com page load time and found that the first response time was 406 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rigert.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rigert.com

406 ms

piwik.js

186 ms

rigert-wappen.gif

185 ms

background.jpg

188 ms

embed.js

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Rigert.com, 11% (1 request) were made to Worldtimeserver.com and 11% (1 request) were made to Wieistmeineip.ch. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (763 ms) belongs to the original domain Rigert.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

69.2 kB

After Optimization

44.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Rigert.com main page is 69.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 41.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 25.5 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 41.3 kB
  • After minification 39.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rigert images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 201 B

  • Original 607 B
  • After minification 607 B
  • After compression 406 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201 B or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rigert. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rigert.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

rigert.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rigert.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rigert.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rigert.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rigert. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: