1.6 sec in total
169 ms
1.3 sec
197 ms
Visit rjf.com now to see the best up-to-date Rjf content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rjf.com
A client-focused global financial services company providing wealth management, capital markets, asset management and other tailored services to individuals and institutions.
Visit rjf.comWe analyzed Rjf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
rjf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value21.2 s
0/100
25%
Value14.5 s
1/100
10%
Value4,780 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.608
10/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
169 ms
292 ms
420 ms
133 ms
212 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rjf.com, 57% (28 requests) were made to Raymondjames.com and 16% (8 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (420 ms) relates to the external source Raymondjames.com.
Page size can be reduced by 327.3 kB (47%)
689.4 kB
362.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Rjf.com main page is 689.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 277.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rjf needs image optimization as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 80.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.9 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 180.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rjf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 180.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (50%)
38
19
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rjf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rjf.com
169 ms
www.raymondjames.com
292 ms
bootstrap.css
420 ms
rjfonts.css
133 ms
rj_icon_font.css
212 ms
font-awesome.min.css
5 ms
global.css
254 ms
modernizr-2.8.3-respond-1.4.2.min.js
250 ms
global-head.js
194 ms
jquery.min.js
68 ms
bootstrap.min.js
119 ms
global-footer.js
175 ms
jsapi
44 ms
cse.js
55 ms
global-tag-manager.js
64 ms
cse.js
102 ms
analytics.js
75 ms
eloqua.js
95 ms
rj_logo_retina_white_001.png
153 ms
lwp_img.jpg
156 ms
raymond-james-cares-hi-res-001.jpg
156 ms
160120-reilly.jpg
150 ms
activityi;src=2593890;type=raymo614;cat=raymo401;ord=1;num=8285855501890.183
72 ms
bkg_input.gif
136 ms
bg_stripe.jpg
144 ms
locator_img.jpg
177 ms
2624_s.jpg
159 ms
corp_inst_banner.jpg
222 ms
working_with_banner.jpg
262 ms
1.jpg
212 ms
2.jpg
213 ms
3.jpg
218 ms
18 ms
grotesquemtrjc-reg-webfont.ttf
250 ms
grotesquemtrjc-bold-webfont.ttf
300 ms
icomoon.woff
317 ms
grotesquemtrjc-light-webfont.ttf
263 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
15 ms
collect
63 ms
collect
95 ms
default+en.css
6 ms
default+en.I.js
17 ms
jsapi
78 ms
elqCfg.min.js
41 ms
default.css
21 ms
ga-audiences
19 ms
svrGP
53 ms
default.css
9 ms
svrGP.aspx
16 ms
rjf.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rjf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rjf.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rjf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rjf.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rjf.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rjf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: