Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

329 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

667 ms

rlslog.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rlslog.net homepage info - get ready to check RLSLog best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rlslog.net

Visit rlslog.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rlslog.net page load time and found that the first response time was 329 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rlslog.net performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,150 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rlslog.net

329 ms

style.css

133 ms

01.gif

44 ms

people-australia-march-2016.jpg

24 ms

79.js

167 ms

Our browser made a total of 219 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Rlslog.net, 9% (20 requests) were made to Bh.contextweb.com and 5% (11 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (554 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (26%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Rlslog.net main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 51.0 kB

  • Original 67.1 kB
  • After minification 64.1 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 555.6 kB

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RLSLog needs image optimization as it can save up to 555.6 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 438.0 kB

  • Original 660.5 kB
  • After minification 654.8 kB
  • After compression 222.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 438.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 96.8 kB

  • Original 115.9 kB
  • After minification 87.1 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rlslog.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 119 (60%)

Requests Now

199

After Optimization

80

The browser has sent 199 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RLSLog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rlslog.net accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rlslog.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

rlslog.net SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rlslog.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Thai is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rlslog.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RLSLog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: