5.2 sec in total
1.8 sec
3.2 sec
307 ms
Visit rmfw.org now to see the best up-to-date Rmfw content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rmfw.org
Visit rmfw.orgWe analyzed Rmfw.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rmfw.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value6.2 s
44/100
10%
Value550 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.096
90/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
1772 ms
112 ms
135 ms
30 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Rmfw.org, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Ssl-static.libsyn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rmfw.org.
Page size can be reduced by 662.2 kB (31%)
2.1 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rmfw.org main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rmfw images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 303.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 303.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 279.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmfw.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 279.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (69%)
84
26
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rmfw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rmfw.org
1772 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
112 ms
wp-filebase.css
135 ms
css
30 ms
style.css
132 ms
mobile.css
134 ms
style.css
137 ms
unsemantic-grid.min.css
136 ms
style.css
177 ms
mobile.min.css
208 ms
font-awesome.min.css
198 ms
style.css
201 ms
unsemantic-grid-responsive-tablet.min.css
204 ms
style.css
201 ms
style.css
243 ms
style.css
268 ms
style.css
273 ms
genericons.css
335 ms
jetpack.css
274 ms
jquery.js
407 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
318 ms
photon.js
332 ms
parallax.js
339 ms
navigation.js
338 ms
parallax.js
384 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
13 ms
gprofiles.js
62 ms
wpgroho.js
534 ms
navigation.min.js
533 ms
dropdown.min.js
532 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
533 ms
jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js
542 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
549 ms
jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js
551 ms
jquery.cycle2.video.min.js
550 ms
script.js
552 ms
script.js
549 ms
client.js
551 ms
wp-embed.min.js
562 ms
e-201611.js
8 ms
Attendees03-slider-550x275.jpg
106 ms
nuggets-slider.jpg
106 ms
sm-facebook.png
102 ms
128 ms
woty02-550x275.jpg
94 ms
anthologyauthors-550x275.png
104 ms
sm-twitter.png
94 ms
googleplus1.jpg
95 ms
sm-linkedin.png
94 ms
donate.jpg
94 ms
Kristy-Ferrin-1.jpg
96 ms
GrayBackground.jpg
96 ms
RobertJSawyer-sm.jpg
96 ms
AnnHood-sm.jpg
97 ms
rmfw-banner.png
384 ms
pinterest.png
93 ms
sm-rss.png
95 ms
Contest-Winners-3.jpg
97 ms
kristinangie.png
98 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
206 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
207 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
279 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
210 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
210 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
391 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
209 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
277 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
209 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
279 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxlDMrAYtoOisqqMDW9M_Mqc.ttf
278 ms
css
198 ms
css
202 ms
jquery.min.js
204 ms
jquery-ui.js
12 ms
jquery-ui.css
196 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
324 ms
jplayer.playlist.js
322 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
322 ms
standard.css
335 ms
widgets.js
193 ms
hovercard.css
174 ms
services.css
209 ms
g.gif
59 ms
ajax-loader.gif
50 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_75_cccccc_1x100.png
47 ms
post-widget.js
112 ms
player-play-45px.png
59 ms
player-pause-45px.png
81 ms
slider-handle-45px.png
111 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
24 ms
player-libsyn-45px.png
46 ms
height_350_width_350_overlay_PodcastLogo_2016_3000x2.jpg
83 ms
PodcastLogo_2016_3000x2.jpg
231 ms
r1post.css
32 ms
status
48 ms
rmfw.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rmfw.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rmfw.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmfw.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rmfw.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rmfw.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rmfw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: