Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

rml3.com

Maintenance

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

359 ms

Resources Loaded

634 ms

Page Rendered

107 ms

rml3.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rml3.com now to see the best up-to-date Rml 3 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rml3.com

RML3.com, is a site dedicated to some of my hobbies including: Astronomy, Historical Fiction, and Web Site Design.

Visit rml3.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rml3.com page load time and found that the first response time was 359 ms and then it took 741 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rml3.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rml3.com

359 ms

g_v4.css

154 ms

g_layout.css

231 ms

g_theme.css

169 ms

ruthsarian_utilities.js

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Rml3.com, 14% (1 request) were made to Creativecommons.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (359 ms) belongs to the original domain Rml3.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.0 kB (77%)

Content Size

36.2 kB

After Optimization

8.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Rml3.com main page is 36.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 15.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 13.8 kB
  • After minification 10.2 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 7.1 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 15.3 kB
  • After minification 7.0 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rml3.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rml 3. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rml3.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rml3.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rml3.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rml3.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rml3.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rml 3. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: