Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

351 ms

rogainereviews.org screenshot

About Website

Visit rogainereviews.org now to see the best up-to-date Rogainereviews content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rogainereviews.org

Looking for the best hair loss treatment such as Rogaine foam and Minoxidil? - Read my review before you buy Ronoxidil, Provillas, or any hair re-growth

Visit rogainereviews.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Rogainereviews.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rogainereviews.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

occ-archive.org

2037 ms

style.css

47 ms

sociable.css

88 ms

styles.css

79 ms

jquery.min.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rogainereviews.org, 12% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Occ-archive.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 464.6 kB (56%)

Content Size

824.6 kB

After Optimization

360.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Rogainereviews.org main page is 824.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 296.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 35.8 kB

  • Original 48.0 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 211.4 kB
  • After minification 205.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rogainereviews images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 199.7 kB

  • Original 296.3 kB
  • After minification 287.1 kB
  • After compression 96.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 199.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 222.8 kB

  • Original 268.9 kB
  • After minification 262.7 kB
  • After compression 46.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rogainereviews.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 222.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (64%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rogainereviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

rogainereviews.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rogainereviews.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rogainereviews.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rogainereviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: