Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

Page Load Speed

856 ms in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

490 ms

Page Rendered

293 ms

rsmap.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rsmap content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rsmap.net

The 2007 RuneScape World Map in HD. Over 30,000 pixels in length bringing you a crystal-clear image that just works. Tons of features!

Visit rsmap.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rsmap.net page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 783 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rsmap.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rsmap.net

73 ms

leaflet.css

13 ms

main.css

21 ms

leaflet-plugins.css

22 ms

font-awesome.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (122 requests) were addressed to the original Rsmap.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (164 ms) belongs to the original domain Rsmap.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 691.7 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

850.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Rsmap.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 734.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 19.6 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 734.7 kB
  • After minification 657.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rsmap needs image optimization as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 378.2 kB

  • Original 537.6 kB
  • After minification 502.8 kB
  • After compression 159.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 378.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 220.1 kB

  • Original 250.2 kB
  • After minification 197.1 kB
  • After compression 30.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rsmap.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 220.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (60%)

Requests Now

123

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 123 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rsmap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rsmap.net accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rsmap.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rsmap.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rsmap.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rsmap.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rsmap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: