5.1 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.5 sec
190 ms
Welcome to sarcom.com homepage info - get ready to check Sarcom best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about sarcom.com
Visit sarcom.comWe analyzed Sarcom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
sarcom.com performance score
1446 ms
83 ms
16 ms
16 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Sarcom.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Pcm.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Pcm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 510.8 kB (54%)
941.6 kB
430.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Sarcom.com main page is 941.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 340.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sarcom needs image optimization as it can save up to 71.7 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 155.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 155.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sarcom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (51%)
75
37
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sarcom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
enterprise
1446 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
83 ms
p-min.js
16 ms
scriptaculous.js
16 ms
trunk8.js
59 ms
wbd.css
62 ms
default.css
61 ms
page.css
61 ms
change-hpage.css
61 ms
news.css
138 ms
header.css
108 ms
main-menu.css
107 ms
modalbox.css
114 ms
velocity.min.js
106 ms
copyrightYear.js
107 ms
newcloudv2.js
113 ms
fancyzoom.js
113 ms
modalbox.js
238 ms
mbox.js
127 ms
slides.jquery.js
267 ms
pcmLiveChat.js
141 ms
mustache.min.js
218 ms
change-hpage.js
151 ms
news.js
158 ms
trunk8.js
162 ms
main-menu.js
176 ms
modernizr3.js
185 ms
msc-427.css
342 ms
s_code.js
201 ms
solutionsPCMmenu.js
211 ms
effects.js
3 ms
controls.js
4 ms
dc.js
30 ms
__utm.gif
49 ms
wrapperWhiteBG.jpg
45 ms
pcmHeader.png
44 ms
ent-vid-2.jpg
383 ms
more9.png
470 ms
ent-ops.jpg
275 ms
getStartedNow.jpg
310 ms
downloadOpstrack.jpg
354 ms
dell_round_logo.jpg
55 ms
hpe.jpg
136 ms
hp.jpg
139 ms
logo_intel_160x88.jpg
463 ms
logo_samsung_160x88.jpg
663 ms
amexLogo.png
335 ms
menu-icon.png
321 ms
pcm-hdr-2px-rep.png
335 ms
mnu-sprt.png
338 ms
texture-repeat-v2.png
358 ms
shadow-repeat.png
359 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
17 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
17 ms
loading.gif
447 ms
news-sprt.png
380 ms
overlay.png
551 ms
footersm.png
386 ms
ftr-sprt.png
413 ms
pcmFooter.png
414 ms
ftr-sprt.png
420 ms
opstrackBg.jpg
1353 ms
iframe_api
50 ms
banner3_980x0.jpg
52 ms
shop_now.png
8 ms
learn_more.png
9 ms
btn-banner.png
460 ms
msc-432
152 ms
s26007495692465
9 ms
www-widgetapi.js
5 ms
jquery-1.4.3.min.js
241 ms
s24238667052704
7 ms
0v3mTzSXUqE
85 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
26 ms
www-embed-player.js
47 ms
base.js
69 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
35 ms
ad_status.js
35 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
36 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
36 ms
vTracker_v2.asp
7 ms
gtmp_compiled.js
35 ms
sarcom.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sarcom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sarcom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sarcom.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sarcom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: