Tools & Wizards About Us
selectorgadget.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

selectorgadget.com

SelectorGadget: point and click CSS selectors

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

237 ms

Resources Loaded

836 ms

Page Rendered

265 ms

selectorgadget.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Selector Gadget content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about selectorgadget.com

Visit selectorgadget.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Selectorgadget.com page load time and found that the first response time was 237 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

selectorgadget.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,360 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

selectorgadget.com

237 ms

128x128.png

182 ms

52055686

80 ms

embed.js

291 ms

player.js

119 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Selectorgadget.com, 25% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (291 ms) relates to the external source Selectorgadget.disqus.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 356.9 kB (67%)

Content Size

530.4 kB

After Optimization

173.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Selectorgadget.com main page is 530.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 377.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 7.0 kB
  • After minification 6.7 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 28.9 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Selector Gadget needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 244.6 kB

  • Original 377.2 kB
  • After minification 377.2 kB
  • After compression 132.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 244.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 103.9 kB

  • Original 117.2 kB
  • After minification 117.1 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Selectorgadget.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 103.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (33%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Selector Gadget. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

selectorgadget.com

selectorgadget.com

237 ms

128x128.png

128x128.png

182 ms

52055686

52055686

80 ms

embed.js

embed.js

291 ms

player.js

player.js

119 ms

player.css

player.css

100 ms

ga.js

ga.js

49 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

99 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

35 ms

proxy.html

proxy.html

79 ms

359024370.webp

359024370.webp

172 ms

02734bb0afe24b614f37a54eada76538

02734bb0afe24b614f37a54eada76538

191 ms

205 ms

ga.js

ga.js

30 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

lounge.load.85ba7336856f5be9db0e468752c2dad5.js

lounge.load.85ba7336856f5be9db0e468752c2dad5.js

63 ms

Accessibility Review

selectorgadget.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

selectorgadget.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

selectorgadget.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Selectorgadget.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Selectorgadget.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

selectorgadget.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Selector Gadget. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: