1.7 sec in total
241 ms
1.3 sec
126 ms
Visit shelliwood.com now to see the best up-to-date Shelliwood content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shelliwood.com
Visit shelliwood.comWe analyzed Shelliwood.com page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
shelliwood.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value2.2 s
94/100
25%
Value3.9 s
83/100
10%
Value750 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
241 ms
451 ms
149 ms
23 ms
3 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Shelliwood.com, 19% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 19% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (451 ms) belongs to the original domain Shelliwood.com.
Page size can be reduced by 37.0 kB (29%)
127.5 kB
90.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Shelliwood.com main page is 127.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 115.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 943 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Shelliwood needs image optimization as it can save up to 943 B or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shelliwood.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (35%)
17
11
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shelliwood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
shelliwood.com
241 ms
www.shelliwood.com
451 ms
layout1.css
149 ms
css
23 ms
adsbygoogle.js
3 ms
ca-pub-8927994746586125.js
48 ms
zrt_lookup.html
40 ms
show_ads_impl.js
52 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
bg1.jpg
144 ms
collect
13 ms
JiDsRhiKZt8uz3NJ5xA06m7WZG3oz88cABkPJxHcz44.ttf
5 ms
ads
258 ms
osd.js
3 ms
m_js_controller.js
19 ms
abg.js
28 ms
favicon
59 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
23 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
20 ms
s
12 ms
x_button_blue2.png
5 ms
shelliwood.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
shelliwood.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
shelliwood.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shelliwood.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shelliwood.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shelliwood.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shelliwood. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: